Home > Android, Intel Atom > Intel Unveils Atom Z3460 & Z3480 (Merrifield) and Z3560 & Z3580 (Moorefield) Mobile SoCs

Intel Unveils Atom Z3460 & Z3480 (Merrifield) and Z3560 & Z3580 (Moorefield) Mobile SoCs

February 24th, 2014 Leave a comment Go to comments

Intel has introduced four new SoCs part of Z34xx series (Merrifield) and Z35xx series (Moorefield) with Intel XMM LTE modems to be used in smartphones and tablets at Mobile World Congress 2014.

Atom_Merrifield_Moorefield_Block_DiagramThe SoCs share the following specifications:

  • Processor
    • Z34xx series (Merrifield) – 2 cores/2 threads with out-of-order execution, maximum core frequency up to 2.13 GHz
    • Z35xx series (Moorefield)- 4 cores/4 threads with out-of-order execution, maximum core frequency up to 2.33 GHz
  • Graphics – Imagination PowerVR G6400 (Merrifield) or GC6430 (Moorefield) with OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and RenderScript support
  • Image Signal Processor (ISP) – 13 MP support hardware-capable; 8 MP enabled on Form Factor Device (FFD)
  • Memory – LPDDR3 (COPoP); 2×32 bit, up to 4 GB; Merrifield: 533MHz max, Moorefield: 800 MHz max.
  • Multi-Band, Multi-Mode LTE Modem – Intel XMM 7160 with support for up to 15 LTE bands, up to 150 Mbps download/50 Mbps upload speed. Z35xx series can also support XMM 6360 HSPA+ modem or XMM 7260 LTE cat 6 modem.
  • Display – Up to 1920×1200 internal (LCD?), 1080p external (HDMI?)
  • I/O and Storage – USB 3.0; eMMC 4.5. 256 GB max.
  • Support for Third-Party Wireless Solutions – Bluetooth 4.0 low energy; Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n/ac)
  • Package – 12 mm x 12 mm

The only apparent difference between SoC of the same family are the maximum turbo clock. Z3460 maxes out at 1.60 GHz, Z3480 at 2.13 GHZ, whereas Z3560 goes up to 1.80 GHz, and Z3580 up to 2.33 GHz.

The processors are part of Intel’s Silvermont microarchitecture, and are manufactured using 22 nm process technology. Z34xx series have up to 1.7 time more single thread CPU performance, 2 times more Graphics performance, and 4 times more GPU compute performance compared to Intel Atom Z2580. The SoCs currently support Android 4.4.2.

Intel Atom Z2580 vs Intel Atom Z3480

Intel Atom Z2580 vs Intel Atom Z3480

Intel also showed some benchmark comparing Z3580 to the current top ARM mobile SoCs, namely Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 and Apple A7. Surprisingly not, the benchmarks show the Intel SoC outperforming both Apple and Qualcomm SoC in several tests, as the company has probably cherry picked the benchmark suiting their SoC, but they all do.

Intel_Atom_Z3480_Snapdragon_800_Apple_A7

Battery life tests also show Intel Z3480 reference design getting ahead of Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 in Galaxy S4 and Sony Xperia Z1F.

Atom_Z3480_Battery_LifeThis looks promising, but we’ll have to wait for independent tests to get a proper appraisal of Intel Z34xx and Z35xx series SoC both in terms of performance and power consumption. In the past, many Android games were not optimized for x86, so even though Intel Z2580 was competitive in theory and in benchmarks, some real-life test were disappointing.

You can find more slides on Engadget and Anandtech.

Thanks to Harley for the tip.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

  1. Marius
    February 25th, 2014 at 02:31 | #1

    Seems Intel didn’t manage to push their own graphics all the way into mobile. Probably not power efficient enough for now but this will probably be the last Intel to use PowerVR.

  1. No trackbacks yet.