Home > AllWinner A8X, Android, Chrome OS, Firefox OS, Linux, Nvidia Tegra K1, Rockchip RK32xx, Samsung Exynos, Ubuntu, Windows 8 > ARM Cortex A15/A17 SoCs Comparison – Nvidia Tegra K1 vs Samsung Exynos 5422 vs Rockchip RK3288 vs AllWinner A80

ARM Cortex A15/A17 SoCs Comparison – Nvidia Tegra K1 vs Samsung Exynos 5422 vs Rockchip RK3288 vs AllWinner A80

We’re now starting to get quite a few players with ARM Cortex A15 cores on the market, as well as some with ARM Cortex A17. So a comparison table of different quad and octa SoCs might be a useful thing to do. I’ve put aside SoCs such as HiSilicon K3V3, and OMAP5, and focused on the four latest processors: Nvidia Tegra K1 (32-bit), Samsung Exynos 5422, Rockchip RK3288 and AllWinner A80. I haven’t included Mediatek MT6595 and Qualcomm SnapDragon 805, because the two companies mainly focus on smartphones and tablets (although it appears to be slowly changing for Qualcomm), documentation is usually difficult or impossible to find, and in the case of Qualcomm they use their own ARMv7 Krait cores.

rk3288_a80_tegra_k1_exynos_5_octaI’ve highlighted some features in green, in case a particular SoC appears to have an edge.

Rockchip RK3288 AllWinner A80 Nvidia Tegra K1 Samsung Exynos 5422
CPU 4x ARM Cortex-A17 @ 1.8 GHZ 4x ARM Cortex-A15 r4 @ 2.0?? GHz +
4x ARM Cortex-A7 @ ?? GHz
big.LITTLE Processing
Quad Core ARM Cortex-A15 r3 @ 2.3GHz + Cortex A15 r3 companion core 4x ARM Cortex-A15 @ 2.1 GHz +
4x ARM Cortex-A7 @ 1.5 GHz
big.LITTLE Processing
L1 Icache/Dcache 32KB/32KB 32KB/32KB 32KB/32KB 32KB/32KB
L2 Cache 1MB 2MB + 512KB 2MB + 512 KB 2MB + 512 KB
GPU ARM Mali-T764 PowerVR G6230 (64-cores) Kepler GK20a (192-cores) ARM Mali-T628 MP6
GPU API OpenGL ES 1.1/2.0/3.0, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.1 and Renderscript, Directx11 OpenGL ES 2.0/3.0, OpenCL 1.x, Directx 9.3 OpenGL ES 2.0/3.0/3.1, OpenGL 4.4, OpenCL 1.2, CUDA 6.0, Directx 12 OpenGL ES 1.1/2.0/3.0, OpenCL 1.1,OpenVG 1.0.1, DirectX 11, and Google Renderscript
Video Decoder 4K2K@60fps: HEVC
4K2K@24fps: H.264, MPEG-2, VP6/VP8, MVC
1080p: MPEG-4, Sorenson Spark, VC-1, RV8/RV9/RV10, and AVS
720×576:H.263
4K2K@30fps: H.264 and VP8
1080p60: MPEG 1/2/4. H.263, H.264, WMV9/VC1, etc…
1080p30: H.265/VP9
3D decoding @ 3840×1080@30fps
1440p – H.264 BP/MP/HP/MVC, VC-1, VP8, MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 1920×1080@120fps – MPEG-4/MPEG-2/H.263/H.264/VP8//VC1
8192×8192 – H.264 and VP8
Video Encoder 1080p30: H.264, MVC, and VP8 4K2K@30fps: H.264 and VP8 H.264
BP/MP/HP/MVC and VP8
1920×1080@120fps – MPEG-4//H.263/H.264/VP8
8192×8192 – H.264 and VP8
Memory (On-chip) 20KB BootRom, 100KB internal SRAM No data 64KB Boot ROM (IROM) No data
Memory Interfaces DDR3-1333/DDR3L-1333, LPDDR2-1066, LPDDR3-1066, up to 4GB
Dual channel async NAND flash, 8-bit, 60-bit ECC
Single channel async NAND flash, 16-bit, 60-bit ECC
eMMC v4.5
SD/MMC Interface (SD 3.0, MMC ver 4.5)
DDR3/DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR2, Up to 8GB
Raw NAND with 72-bit ECC
eMMC v4.5
4x SD/MMC
DDR3L, and LPDDR3, up to 8GB
LPDDR2 might work but not tested by Nvidia
eMMC version 4.5
SDIO
LPDDR3/DDR3 – 2-ports 32-bit up to 933 MHz
LPDDR2 – 2-ports 32-bit up to 533 MHz
2x eMMC 5.0, 1x eMMC 4.5
8-bit SDIO 3.0,
4-bit SD 3.0
Display Interfaces Dual channel LVDS
2x Parallel and serial RGB interfaces: Up to 3840×2160 or 2560×1600
MCU LCD interface (optional)
4-lane MIPI up to 1080p60
4-lane eDP up to 4K2K@30fps
HDMI 1.4 and 2.0
Dual channel LVDS up to 1920×1080@60fps
RGB LCD up to 2048×1536@60fps
4-lane MIPI DSI up to 1920×1200@60fps
4-lane eDP up to 2560×1600@60fps
HDMI 1.4
LVDS up to 1920×1200@60fps
2x 4-lane MIPI DSI (Dual link: up to 3840×1920@60fps, single link: 2560×1440@60fps)
4-lane eDP up to 3840×2160@60fps
HDMI 1.4b up to 4096×2160@30fps
4-lane MIPI DSI up to WUXGA (1920×1200) @ 60 fps
1-port (4 lanes) eDisplayPort (eDP) up to WQXGA (2560×1600) @ 60 fps
HDMI 1.4a interfaces with on-chip PHY
Camera Interfaces 12-bit CCIR/Camera I/F up to 5MP
MIPI CSI2 I/F up to 14MP
8/10/12-bit raw data interface
Parallel and MIPI I/F sensor
5M/8M/12M/16M CMOS sensor
8/10/12-bit YUV/Bayer sensor
1x MIPI CSI
Up to 16MP @ 37 fps
2x 4x YUV / RAW / CSI
2-ports (4/4 lanes) MIPI CSI2 interfaces
Up to 16MP @ 30fps
14-bit Bayer sensor
USB 2x USB 2.0 Host
1x USB 2.0 OTG
HSIC
2x USB host
1x USB3.0/2.0 host / device
HSIC
2x USB 3.0
3x USB 2.0
HSIC
2x USB 3.0
1x USB 2.0
1x HSIC
Ethernet 1x GMAC (RMII/RGMII) 1x Ethernet MAC N/A N/A
TS Interface 2x IN, 1x IN No data 1x TS 1x TSI
SATA N/A N/A SATA 3.1 N/A
PCIe N/A N/A 5-lane PCIe with Gen1 (2.5GT/s) and Gen 2 (%.0 GT/s) speeds N/A
Audio I/F PCM/I2S, SPDIF PCM/I2S PCM/I2S, S/PDIF 1x PCM, 2x I2S, 1x S/PDIF
Other I/Os 3x SPI, 6x I2C, 5x UART, 4x PWM, 2x DMAC, 160 GPIO 4x SPI, 7x TWI, 7x UART 3x I2C, 2x SPI, UART, Up to 64 MPIO (Multi Purpose IO) 4x I2C, 7x HS-I2C, 3x SPI, 5x UART, GPIOs, 24-channel DMA controller
Antutu 4.x 35225
Hardware: Pipo P8 (res: 2048×1536)
41556
Hardware: AllWinner OptimusBoard?
43851
Hardware: Tegra K1 Reference Tablet?
38580
Hardware: Samsung Galaxy S5 (SMG900H)
Low Cost Development Board Currently not available, none officially announced. Announced: OptimusBoard, PcDuino8, Cubieboard A80. No price available. Nvidia Jetson TK1 for $192 None with Exynos 5422, but two with the similar Exynos 5420:
Arndale Octa for $179
Announced: ODROID XU-2 (Price not available)

First some general comments:

  1. As details are not always available, and I had to go through thousands of pages of documentation, it’s possible some information is incorrect or missing. So I’d be grateful if anybody points out mistakes in the table.
  2. In L2 Cache = xx MB + xx KB refers to the cache for the bit processors (A15) + the cache for the LITTLE processors (A7) or the companion core.
  3. The “Other I/Os” section is mainly for reference, as I’m sure parts are missing here.
  4. I haven’t addressed power consumption of the different SoC, since I don’t believe numbers provided by the SoC vendors are directly comparable.
  5. Antutu scores are interesting to get an idea of the performance, but we should bear in mind AllWinner A80 and Tegra K1 scores appear to have been achieved with development hardware, which may not have the same thermal constraints as the tablet and smartphone used with Rockchip RK3288 and Exynos 5422.

Based on this comparison table, Nvidia Tegra K1 really seems to have the best package in terms of performance, 3D and GPGPU APIs, and peripheral interfaces such as SATA and PCIe which are missing on all other SoCs. The downsides are video encoding is only supported up to 1440p, and there’s no Ethernet MAC. That means no 4K hardware video decoding, although an article from Anandtech mentioned the company demos 4K 30 fps using the Kepler GPU. The way to add Ethernet with Tegra K1 is to use an external Ethernet Control chip and connect it to the PCI Express port, as they did for Jetson TK1 development board. It’s also likely Tegra K1 is more expensive than all other three, but it’s very versatile and could be found in various type of products: tablets, mini PCs, laptops and so on. Linux and Android are supported, and since the company seem inclined to go open source, it’s likely any Linux based OS can be supported by the platform.

Rockchip RK3288 should be one of the more cost effective platform in the table, but trade offs includes 1MB L2 cache (vs 2MB for others), an 4GB RAM limitation, the lack of USB 3.0 interfaces, and lower overall performance. However it’s the only SoC that 100% 4K ready here with HDMI 2.0, HEVC decode at up to 4K @ 60fps, as well as Gigabit Ethernet. ARM Cortex A17 should also have lower consumption compared to ARM Cortex A15, but it’s unclear how it will compare against big.LITTLE solution. This will probably remain a gray area because power efficiency will highly depend on the payload. RK3288 has already been demoed on hardware running Android and Chromium OS.

AllWinner A80 has performance very close to Tegra K1, apparently supports VP9 (N.B: However, I had been asked to remove VP9 from an AllWinner A80 graphics once), supports 4K30 video decoding, USB 3.0. Apart from the lack of SATA and PCIe interfaces, and OpenGL 4.4 support, AllWinner SoC appears to have few drawbacks compared to Tegra K1, so we’ll have to see how it compares in terms of price versus Rockchip RK3288. The company has also announced support for 5 operating systems for A80: Android, Chrome OS, Ubuntu, Windows 8, and Firefox OS. So they must have worked with Imagination Technology to support the PowerVR GPU on these OS.

Samsung Exynos 5422 appears to be just short of AllWinner A80 and Tegra K1 performance, and the company has dropped some interfaces such as SATA, PCIe, LVDS, Ethernet MAC,  that makes it a little less versatile than other SoCs, and more targeted at tablets and smartphones. It’s the only SoC that supports both 8K encode and decode (H.264 and VP8 only), but lacks HEVC/H.265 hardware support. It’s also the only SoC to support eMMC 5.0, instead of just eMMC 4.5, which can potentially double the IO performance (400MB/s max instead of 200 MB/s).

References:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

  1. Galll0s
    May 21st, 2014 at 20:53 | #1

    Finally a chip with 4K2K@60fps HEVC & HDMI 2.0

  2. Dion
    May 22nd, 2014 at 14:54 | #2

    What about the Amlogic S802-H?? Its right there with them?

  3. Dion
    May 22nd, 2014 at 14:55 | #3

    Dion :
    What about the Amlogic S802-H?? Its right there with them?

    oh -ok its A15/A17 arms

  4. m][sko
    May 22nd, 2014 at 17:22 | #4

    I would like to know if it is really true about HEVC in RK3288
    as If they handle HEVC with openCL it is still hw base.
    I saw video on youtube with one of rockchip manager
    we can handle HEVC right now with libav on our RK3188 in 720p :)

    CPU or GPU base decoders looks as good idea for me with this so many core systems.
    But DSP is much better for power efficient.

  5. May 22nd, 2014 at 22:57 | #5

    Specifications are good, but what I’m really curious about are some benchmarks.

  6. Mark
    May 23rd, 2014 at 00:48 | #6

    I am excited about the 4k2k@60fps not so much for THAT output, but because 1080P should be rock solid with that much overhead…@Galll0s

  7. May 23rd, 2014 at 10:33 | #7

    @Dion
    Amlogic S802 performance is in another category, at least in terms of CPU/GPU performance. Antutu is 30,000 (at most), and when I tested the box I got around 23,000. The GPU does not support OpenCL and so on.

    @m][sko
    HEVC is apparently decoded using an hardware video decoder. You can check it in RK3288 datasheet linked at the bottom of the post.

    None of the SoC in the list have an HEVC encoder however. It would have been nice to be able to record 4K videos encoded with H.265. I assume an HEVC encoder would be too expensive right now. Maybe Snapdragon 805 will be able to do it.

    @Ikem
    Some benchmarks result (Antutu) are in the table.

  8. alfon
    June 13th, 2014 at 21:33 | #8

    “So I’d be grateful if anybody points out mistakes in the tablet”

    I don’t know about mistakes in the table, but in the quoted phrase, “tablet” should read “table”.
    HTH

  9. June 13th, 2014 at 21:35 | #9

    @alfon
    Thanks. I corrected the typo.

  10. June 25th, 2014 at 15:24 | #10

    HiSiliCon Kirin920 is not too bad either with Antutu close to 40,000 – http://androidpc.es/blog/2014/06/25/el-nuevo-soc-de-hisilicon-kirin-920-llega-a-los-40k-en-antutu/

  1. No trackbacks yet.