Start9’s “RISC-V Router” is powered by a SpacemiT K1 octa-core RISC-V processor paired with 4GB RAM and 16GB eMMC flash, and offers dual GbE networking, as well as an AsiaRF AW7915-NP1 WiFi 6 4T4R module enabling up to 2401 Mbps combined data link.
It’s not exactly a high-end router, but Start9 claims it is the “most open router on the market” thanks to its RISC-V processor, OpenSBI open-source boot stack, and StartWrt operating system, a fork of OpenWrt.
Start9 router specifications:
- SoC – SpacemiT K1
- CPU – 8-core X60 RISC-V processor with single-core performance equivalent to about 1.3x the performance of an Arm Cortex-A55
- GPU – Imagination IMG BXE-2-32 with support for OpenCL 3.0, OpenGL ES3.2, Vulkan 1.2
- VPU – H.265, H.264, VP9, VP8 4K encoding/encoding
- NPU – 2.0 TOPS AI accelerator
- System Memory – 4GB LPDDR4
- Storage
- 16GB eMMC flash
- MicroSD card slot
- Networking
- 2x Gigabit Ethernet RJ45 ports (1x LAN, 1x WAN)
- Dual-band 2.4GHz/5GHz WiFi 6 (802.11ax) via AsiaRF AW7915-NP1 4T4R Mini PCIe Module; up to 2,401 Mbps
- 3x external high-gain antennas
- USB – 2x USB 3.0 ports
- Power Supply
- 12V/3A via power barrel jack
- 12V/3A USB PD via the USB-C port on the front panel
- Dimensions – TBD
The hardware appears to have been developed in collaboration with Deep Computing, which very recently introduced another RISC-V hardware: the DC-ROMA RISC-V Mainboard III for Framework Laptop 13, powered by a new SpacemiT K3 SoC.
I understand Start9 focuses on the software stack, divided into two main parts:
- OpenSBI Open Source Supervisor Binary Interface, a firmware layer in the boot process, providing runtime services from the machine mode (M-mode) to the supervisor mode (S-mode) kernel, abstracting platform-specific hardware details and making operating systems more portable across different RISC-V systems.
- StartWRT fork of OpenWrt, with a modern GUI, and the following key features:
- Security Profiles – Each device on the network receives a Security Profile to determine its permissions
- Points of Entry – Ethernet, WiFi, and VPN to determine the Security Profile of a device.
- WiFi (Identity PSK) – Instead of a “primary” network and a “guest” network, StartWRT uses Identity PSK to provide a single network with multiple passwords, each leading to a different Security Profile.
- Inbound VPNs – Create as many Inbound VPN Servers as you need for personal or shared remote access to the home network.
- Outbound VPNs – Connect unlimited, network-wide outbound VPN clients for Internet privacy. Optionally chain VPN clients together for extra privacy.
- WiFi Blackout Schedules – Optionally disable WiFi in hardware on a schedule.
- One-click dynamic DNS – Use Start9 dynamic DNS for free with a single click. No account necessary.
- Help Mode – Toggle “Help Mode” to get a detailed explanation of everything in the current view.
They also explain that everything will be open, including the RISC-V instruction set, board schematics, boot stack (OpenSBI + U-Boot), Linux kernel, and the StartWRT OS. The only exception is the WiFi radio firmware (usually not open due to FCC regulations). Currently, two early closed-source boot binaries (DRAM initialization and the first-stage bootloader) are required, but they are working on open-source replacements. I couldn’t find any repository for the StartWRT OS, but there’s an OpenWrt repo on the Start9Lab GitHub account with a “Bianbu” branch, which points to SpacemiT K1 support.
The Start9 device is not quite the first RISC-V router or SBC, as we’ve seen the Banana Pi BPI-F3 (also based on SpacemiT K1), Orange Pi R2S (K1, but no WiFi), and SiFlower SF21H8898-based the Banana Pi BPI-RV2 with optional enclosure and official OpenWrt support.
Start9 is asking for Bitcoin donations to support software development, or a $300+ payment from people who want to get its RISC-V Router by September 2026. Note it’s significantly more than the $95 asked for the similarly specced Banana Pi BPI-F3, to which you need to add a $15 metal enclosure for a complete system, so the majority of the funds go towards software development rather than the hardware itself.
Via HackerNews

Jean-Luc started CNX Software in 2010 as a part-time endeavor, before quitting his job as a software engineering manager, and starting to write daily news, and reviews full time later in 2011.
Support CNX Software! Donate via cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or purchase goods on Amazon or Aliexpress. We also use affiliate links in articles to earn commissions if you make a purchase after clicking on those links.






Yes keep those riscv openwrt routers coming. The more the merrier. Although 4x LAN would be more attractive in hobbyist consumer market.
It would be best if they upstream at least all the hardware port they do back to mainline linux kernel.
There is no proper reason to get this when you can get a 2.5Gbit WAN RISC-V board with upstream OpenWrt support for less then 40$: Banana Pi BPI-RV2
Because with the Banana Pi BPI-RV2 you do not get some closed source wifi, you can get a opensource ath9k WiFi card and install it in there to have a more open Router then this here.
I see why you would prefer an atheros card over mediatek, but an ath9k (a/b/g/n) over a mt7915 (a/b/g/n/ac/ax 4×4)…
Would the obvious alternative not be an QCN9074 wifi adapter or similar (never mind wifi7, at least wifi5 or wifi6)? Or has the quality gone down that much after atheros became qualcomm?
Even with the bananapi the mediatek seems more logical.
I would guess newer qc wifi cards are no more OS, at least I mean to remember that the ath10k (or 11k?) in the Xiaomi router was not easy to get tho work without troubles.
So, the wifi adapter needs to be perfectly open.
For my desktop I have proprietary firmwares for the gpu, ethernet and wireless adapter. For intel or amd you have an extra firmware for the processor, also proprietory (not counting UEFI). So 3-4 proprietary firmwares to boot, for a router “only” 2.
I’d say the time of using only open drivers and open firmware is , sadly, history.
No, using only open source drivers is not history. I am writing this using 450Mbit 3TX3RX open source 5Ghz WiFi. I have no idea why i would need something faster on WiFi. Like most people on the world there is no Gigabit internet speeds available and if there were, i would still not use closed source WiFi for having more then 450Mbit on a mobile device. I want freedom and do not give freedom up for more then 450Mbit on a mobile device where i do not need that.
I have not a single proprietary binary blob running on my OS and use the Linux-Libre kernel.
Your point?
airoha en8811h, reads like the bpi-rv2 you mention is also no alternative with your requirements…
https://git.ti.com/cgit/processor-firmware/ti-linux-firmware/commit/?h=ti-linux-firmware&id=d88562a09aacbd18ba8f707ff7de6a41c490d2b5
Thats sad. I was considering to maybe get one of those at some time. Thanks for figuring this out about the bpi-rv2.