H.265 / HEVC License Pricing Updated for Low Cost Devices

Most video codecs such as H.264, H265/HEVC, MPEG-2, MPEG-4… requires the manufacturer to pay a license fee. The fees are then added to the final product, but the actual codec fees are usually unknown to the end user. One of the exceptions are VC-1 and MPEG-2 license fees for Raspberry pi boards which are sold separately for respectively £1.20 ($1.58 US) and £2.40 ($3.16 US).

So I assumed that licenses pricing was mostly private and negotiated based on volume. But a recent article stated that HEVC Advance, independent licensing administrator, revised the royalties for lower-price devices (<$40) with the price table below providing a good insight into pricing for different device types, unit prices and regions.

Click to Enlarge

The new discounted royalty rate category applied to consumer and commercial products selling for less than $40 including set-top boxes, surveillance cameras, game console and others. A simplified Patent License Agreement (PPL) was also announced in order to reduce costs for licensees.

The table above requires some explanations:

  • Region 1/2 – Region 1 is comprised of countries with higher GPD per capita, and Region 2 are all other countries, mostly developing countries.
  • Advance Profiles Extension –  Additions to version 2 of HEVC specifications with RExt, MV-HEVC and SHVC (3 profiles).
  • Three main categories of devices for licenses:
    • Mobile Devices
    • Connected Home & Other Devices
    • 4K UHD+ TV

The license is apparently applied to the country of sale or manufacture, and “if there are no patents in both the country of manufacture and the country of sale, then no royalties are due for HEVC”. Those licenses appear to be for manufacturers, so I don’t know if silicon vendors pay a license too. I also don’t understand what happens to those TV boxes sold from China, and shipped to various countries around the world, how is the licensee fee calculated, if any? Comments are welcome.

The good news is that in case HEVC license fees are indeed paid in China, cheap devices with H.265 codec should become even cheaper with up to 85 cents less royalities to be paid per devices.

Thanks to Theguyuk for the tip.

Share this:

Support CNX Software! Donate via PayPal or cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or buy review samples

ROCK Pi 4C Plus
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
The comment form collects your name, email and content to allow us keep track of the comments placed on the website. Please read and accept our website Terms and Privacy Policy to post a comment.
8 Comments
oldest
newest
Jon Smirl
4 years ago

It is not this simple, there are multiple patent pools claiming ownership of h.265. Licensing with this one does not settle things with the other pools. This multi-pool fighting is a core reason h.265 is going nowhere.

The overlapping demands can exceed $5 per device.

Wellwell
Wellwell
4 years ago

Anyone Wonder why this is being done? Discounted royalties? Google “AV1” – The royalty free codec developed by the tech community.

Jerry
Jerry
4 years ago

F*ck patents. 20 years of “protection” does not really work in the tech business.

Jon Smirl
4 years ago

The h.265 royalty is charged at the time a brand is applied to the finished product. So when the brand Axis is applied to a webcam, they owe the h.265 royalty at that point (if they choose to enable it). So you can make all of the chips you want that support h.265 without paying royalties. The royalties are designed this way on purpose. Make it royalty-free to spread the hardware, then stick it to the last person in the supply chain. So first I suspect almost none of those TV boxes are bothering to pay royalties to anyone. There… Read more »

Keith Woodward
4 years ago

That’s a very interesting insight Jon, thank you.

pug_ster
pug_ster
4 years ago

@Jon Smirl

Do you think that is the reason why many android tv boxes are shipped from China? Skirt the licensing fees and having android tv boxes with kodi preloaded?

Jon Smirl
4 years ago

Most Android TV boxes are built in China because all of the cheap SOCs used in those boxes come from China. China is a very low-cost place to build electronics. It does not make much sense to ship those Chinese SOCs to another country with higher manufacturing costs. Adding Kodi is a secondary effect. China would still be making these cheap STBs even if Kodi did not exist. Big Chinese manufacturers pay the legitimate royalties. I can understand why the smaller companies don’t. It’s a complicated mess to figure out what you owe and it is simpler to just ignore… Read more »

Advertisement