When I read a review about MK808B Plus this morning, I noticed the reviewer used Antutu Video Tester to evaluate video/audio performance of the device. Somehow I had never noticed it, and Antutu developers claim it can not only check whether video or audio codec are supported, but the tool can also give an appraisal of video quality:
AnTuTu Video Test is a professional tool for testing video playback capability of Android Smart TV, set-top boxes and other devices. It integrates a few featured videos and testing algorithms that can help users judge the playback performance of the devices clearly. AnTuTu video test can not only detect the video playback formats devices support, but also can test the playback quality of devices.
Let’s check out the results and list of files.
So they test a bunch of videos with 1080p and 2160p resolution with the most common codec, but it’s far from extensive. Based on this table, the only problem with the box is that it can not play DTS or AC-3 files with the video player (stock?) used in the tester. So overall it does not look that bad. But since I noticed some 1080p pixelated videos, and/or skipped frames, Chameleon got just 263 points, which is rather low compared to some other television sets or TV boxes, and should mean Antutu Video Tester does indeed take into account video playback “quality” as advertised.
Have you tried on your Android media player? What’s your score?
Jean-Luc started CNX Software in 2010 as a part-time endeavor, before quitting his job as a software engineering manager, and starting to write daily news, and reviews full time later in 2011.
14 Replies to “Antutu Video Tester Automatically Tests Video and Audio Codecs & Playback Quality in Android”
I noticed that when I did run the test, some of the videos passed but watching the actual test, you could see them choke. For example, in my MK808B Plus review, the VP8 video passed but playback was really choppy. I wish the app would log things like framerate/dropped/skipped frames, etc
Yes, me too but I think this is reflected in the score.
This does not actually test if hardware video/audio decoding works using VPU/DSP?
Does this not only test software video/audio decoding using raw CPU compute?
I believe this tests simply only runs software decode using raw CPU compute power as a way to compare CPU performance.
Open Hour got only 276 points, but HiMedia Q5 (dual or quad core Hisilicon Cortex A9 depending on model) gets 704 points.
Rockchip RK3288 would get a better score (vs Hisilicon SoCs) with software audio/video decoding, and DTS / AC3 would work. So I guess it’s not caring about hardware or software decoding. It’s just probably using the MediaCodec API with stock video player?, check whether it works, possibly (but not sure) check frame rate and other quality parameters, and provides a score.
my score is 382, what does it mean? does this have a guide where I can translate the scores for better understanding?
The higher the score the better. I could not find details how they compute the score, but it depends on the vide/audio decoding results, quality, and frame rate. You may see some videos look pixelated during testing, those should decrease the overall score. The best score is 704 so far.
the ‘Tronsmart Draco AW80’ get 704… but I don’t know about the symbol with the number at the score, because I get a 5 and if 704 is the truth, it must be 1… (http://www.freaktab.com/showthread.php?20763-AnTuTu-Video-Tester)
And at the RK3288 (UBOX at 111K4) I get 320 with a 3 (http://www.freaktab.com/showthread.php?21764-ro-sys-hiritsu-(Real-AnTuTu-result)&p=269620&viewfull=1#post269620)…
I assume they both give a score in the hundred, and a number of stars 3 stars, 5 stars… with 5 stars being the best.
Ahhh, ok, this means ‘stars’ and not ‘place’… 🙂
On my mbox m8 s802, 2gb, Android 4.4 scored 911 . HD TV.