Home > Hardware, Intel Atom > $60 MSI J1800i Motherboard Features 10W Intel Celeron “Bay Trail” Processor

$60 MSI J1800i Motherboard Features 10W Intel Celeron “Bay Trail” Processor

We’ve now got plenty of low cost and low power ARM based boards and devices, but Intel is not sitting by idly, and in recent years they’ve worked to greatly reduce the power consumption of some of their processors, and relatively low power, cost effective Intel based motherboards will be available later this year. For example, MSI J1800i will be based on Intel Celeron J1800 dual core Bay Trail processor with 10W TDP, 64-bit support, and cost around $60 when it becomes available end of January or in February.

MSI_J1800iHere are some of the specifications of this motherboard:

  • SoC – Intel Celeron J1800i dual core @ 2.41 with integrated Intel HD graphics
  • System Memory – 2x DDR3-1333 SO-DIMM slots (Up to 8GB)
  • Storage – 2x Serial ATA 3Gbps ports
  • Video Output – HDMI, VGA, and DVI
  • Connectivity – 1x Ethernet
  • USB – 2x USB 3.0 host ports, 4x USB 2.0 host ports
  • Expansion – single PCIe Express x1 slot
  • Audio – Speaker, audio in and audio out jacks
  • Misc – PS/2 mouse and keyboard connectors

The “recommended customer price” for Celeron J1800 processor is $72.00 on Intel website. I’m not sure if this is just for the “boxed version”, but it seems difficult to make a $60 motherboard with a $72 CPU, unless they talked about volume pricing. We’ll have to see. You’ll need to add memory (4GB SO-DIMM DDR3 is about $40 now), and potentially a SATA HDD or SSD to get the full price for comparison to ARM platforms. There will also be a quad core version for $70, probably based on Celeron J1850 (10W TDP).

The benchmark results below give an ideas of Intel process in terms of power consumption, by showing a Celeron J1850 (10W TDP) launched at the end of 2013 has about the same CPU performance as an Intel Core2 Duo E8200 processor (65 TDP) launched in 2008.

Bay_Trail_Intel_J1800_CPU_benchmark_vs_Core2_Duo

As a comparison, an ARM Linux or Android computer will typically consume 2.5W to 10W (possibly 15W for Cortex A15). That’s the whole board, and the motherboard above will consume more than 10W once you add all components, but the gap is narrowing.

Source: Tech Report, via Fanless Tech

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter

  1. Someone from the other side
    January 14th, 2014 at 15:19 | #1

    Someone please build one with 6 Sata, I want to upgrade the lowly AMD C60 in my NAS…

  2. Someone from the other side
    January 14th, 2014 at 15:22 | #2

    I would definitely prefer these to ARM for media PC, BTW (even if they need a bit more power). Finally no ARM weirdness and actually working drivers (unlike RK and Allwinner) for all major OSes. Then again, I already have a core I3 NUC so not sure if I will bother upgrading that (though less heat would be welcome)…

  3. Xan
    January 14th, 2014 at 15:56 | #3

    More competition is welcomed.

    Now I need to rethink my plans for new XBMC box and small NAS/torrent/XDCC box… this looks indeed nice.

  4. passante
    January 14th, 2014 at 19:50 | #4

    No SATA port… Also for me is a no go :(

  5. January 14th, 2014 at 19:53 | #5

    @passante
    there are two SATA ports… Comment in wrong post?

  6. JotaMG
    January 14th, 2014 at 21:41 | #6

    Yes, if the final retail price is this it will be competitive.
    Really you don’t need a HD, you can use a SD card and USB card reader for less than $5, and you get a running system.
    (but no wi-fi)

  7. January 14th, 2014 at 22:50 | #7

    But how much is the performance difference to a IMX6q ?
    Because, for a complete x86 motherboard with CPU, I think it is cheap.
    And probably it is plug and play and not the nightmare of some ARM boards.

    By the way, gigabit network ?

  8. Andrew
    January 15th, 2014 at 00:46 | #8

    This is an 22nm Atom mainboard with a dual core (Silvermont) CPU.
    http://ark.intel.com/products/78866/Intel-Celeron-Processor-J1800-1M-Cache-up-to-2_58-GHz
    There are two SATA ports and since there is a PCI-E (1x) slot, you could add a SATA controller card if you need 4 more SATA ports. There is also a GB Ethernet port.
    http://www.msi.com/product/mb/J1800I-.html#/?div=Basic
    As for WiFi and Bluetooth, there are a number of inexpensive miniature USB adapters that one could use.
    The main advantage of this sort of mainboard compared to the various ARM TV box solutions is the Linux compatibility: this is an x86/64-bit CPU with an Ivy Bridge based GPU (Intel HD graphics). Your usual Linux distribution will probably boot directly on this thing and evey peripheral will be perfectly supported.
    There are two disadvantages though:
    a) Cost and size. The CPU alone costs $72 (tray, 1000 quantities). Most probably there is a mistake in the reported price, this mainboard is likely to sell for $160, NOT $60. Also you need a suitable case, power supply, RAM, hard disk, etc, so essentially you are assembling a low power, low performance PC with similar costs.
    b) Android compatibility. ARM is still the way to go for running Android.

  9. panicopticon
    January 15th, 2014 at 03:24 | #9
  10. passante
    January 15th, 2014 at 04:39 | #10

    @cnxsoft
    Ops, I didn’t checked the original site and it was not clear from the list. Good news!

  11. passante
    January 15th, 2014 at 04:40 | #11

    @cnxsoft
    Ops, sorry.

  12. JotaMG
    January 15th, 2014 at 08:32 | #12

    Andrew :
    b) Android compatibility. ARM is still the way to go for running Android.

    Who needs Android when you can have full Linux support??

    3 questions:
    1) do the board need a fan for the cpu? (hope not)
    2) is the Cpu swappable?
    3) can one use a Power Supply without fan, or with the fan disabled?

  13. January 15th, 2014 at 10:12 | #13

    @panicopticon
    Oops, I looked for it, but somehow failed to find it when I wrote the article. Thanks!

    @JotaMG
    1) As I understand it, no fan is needed.
    2) CPU is soldered on the board.
    3) Probably yes, with something like http://www.e-itx.com/mini-box-m350.html

  14. mcg
    January 15th, 2014 at 16:41 | #14

    It would be a great XBMC / NAS / Torrent box… if it had spdif out. It could substitute my 4w raspberry pi + 13.5w NAS.

  15. January 15th, 2014 at 22:46 | #15

    It looks like a great replacement for my aging amd e-350 box.

  16. adem
    January 16th, 2014 at 07:07 | #16

    How about this one. you might as well pay the extra $10 and get two more cores

    http://ark.intel.com/products/78867/Intel-Celeron-Processor-J1900-2M-Cache-up-to-2_42-GHz

  17. adem
    January 16th, 2014 at 09:33 | #17
  18. adem
    January 16th, 2014 at 10:03 | #18

    hey guys going off topic here but i really want to know if its possible to use this cooler with a extra block connected to a gpu

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUETV2EpUgg

    if so i might buy it. it’s around $160 although i dont know how much a block would cost for my gigabyte 650 ti boost it would be if i can cool two thing with one pump also the fans dont work on my gpu

  19. Sander
    January 16th, 2014 at 13:53 | #19

    The Celeron J1800 processor is $72.00?! Wow, what a hefty price, even for a SoC. (It is a SoC, right?)

  20. January 16th, 2014 at 14:15 | #20

    @Sander
    There’s a wide range of prices for processors and SoC. Something like AllWinner A13 probably starts at $5, Mediatek MT6589 costs around $10-12, RK3288 costs $40 now, last year I bought a system with a $200 CPU, and if you want the very latest Intel desktop processor I think you may have to fork over $1,000.

    J1800 includes both CPU and GPU, but I probably an external chipset for I/O. Not 100% sure. I’d assume the Tegra K1 would cost something in the same price range.

  21. January 16th, 2014 at 14:18 | #21

    @cnxsoft
    I’m not very clear about the requested quantities for the prices above. I think ARM SoC are priced in volume, but J1800 is probably priced per unit at $72, since MSI can allegedly make a $60 motherboard with that very processor.

  22. Gabe
    January 16th, 2014 at 15:11 | #22
  23. Someone from the other side
    January 16th, 2014 at 17:51 | #23

    Seeing that the 4 core and the 2 core Bay Trail D both have a TDP of 10W, i would seriously expect the 2 core to draw less than 6-7W under full load. Of course the South Bridge and the ram will still draw some, on top of that. So it’s not quite ARM territory yet but it’s also much faster.

  24. Someone from the other side
    January 16th, 2014 at 17:55 | #24

    Thinking of it, I might be better off buying an Akasa Newton case for my existing Core i3 NUC and finally silence that bugger (it very much eludes me why it got good ratings on noise online)…

  25. Gabe
    January 24th, 2014 at 01:27 | #25

    Gigabyte J1800n around 90 US dollars, not in stock yet:
    http://www.pcgarage.ro/placi-de-baza/gigabyte/ga-j1800n-d2h

  26. February 3rd, 2014 at 15:07 | #26

    More J1800 motherboards by Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H and BIOSTAR J1800NH
    http://www.fanlesstech.com/2014/02/a-duo-of-celeron-j1800-motherboards.html
    http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4881
    http://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/mb/introduction.php?S_ID=688

    The price seems quite good @ $55.99 on http://www.directron.com/j1800nh.html. Never heard of directron before though.

  27. Smeghead
    February 7th, 2014 at 10:10 | #27

    @cnxsoft
    I wouldn’t be surprised if #4 meant no *mSATA* port. That would make a lot more sense.

  28. February 7th, 2014 at 11:49 | #28

    @Smeghead
    Could be, or it might just be because I wrote “Serial ATA” instead of “SATA”, and a quick search for “SATA” did not show up anything in the list…

  29. mike
    February 13th, 2014 at 10:27 | #29

    So Mobo is $70 plus $40 for memory plus $40 for case plus $40 for power supply gives $190 versus a complete ARM Quad Core mini pc at $60. So almost 3x price of quad core ARM which is a reasonably fast system. Curious how the performance would compare between the two.

  30. Someone from the other side
    February 13th, 2014 at 16:59 | #30

    @mike
    It will have vastly better software support than any of the cheap androids, for damn sure.

  31. February 13th, 2014 at 17:24 | #31

    @mike
    The processor should be much faster, even the dual core versin, and you’ve got some nice interface like SATA, Ethernet, USB 3.0, mini PCIe, VGA and Displayport Output that you would not find on $60 quad core ARM mini PCs. Software support should be much better too, as mentioned by @Someone from the other side , especially if you want to run Linux (instead of Android).

    You’ll also need to add a mass storage device with an OS to boot the x86 system. But it can be a simple USB flash drive, if you don’t need an hard drive. Bay trail power consumption will be higher too, and it may add to a few tens of dollars every year (Just a guess I haven’t run the numbers).

    FYI. I’ve built a system (virtually, I haven’t actually tried that) that comes to $250 with the dual core version, 1TB HDD, and 4GB RAM, enclosure and PSU.
    http://www.cnx-software.com/2014/01/15/building-a-low-power-fanless-intel-bay-trail-d-mini-pc-for-250/.

  32. March 4th, 2014 at 09:31 | #32
  1. January 15th, 2014 at 11:25 | #1
  2. February 3rd, 2014 at 16:05 | #2
  3. February 4th, 2014 at 02:27 | #3
  4. February 6th, 2014 at 16:15 | #4