GPUs Comparison: ARM Mali vs Vivante GCxxx vs PowerVR SGX vs Nvidia Geforce ULP

I’m always very confused when it comes to comparing GPUs in different SoCs, and I could not really find comparisons on the web, so I’m going to give it a try even though, as you’re going to find out, it’s actually quite a challenge.

There are mainly 4 companies that provide GPUs: ARM, Imagination Technologies, Vivante and Nvidia. [Update: Two comments  mentioned Qualcomm Adreno and Broadcom VideoCore are missing from the list. Maybe I’ll do an update later]. Each company offers many different versions and flavors of their GPU as summarized below.

ARM Imagination Technologies Vivante Nvidia
  • Mali-400 Series:
    • Mali-400 MP
    • Mali-450 MP
  • Mali-600 Series
    • Mali-T604
    • Mali-T624
    • Mali-T628
    • Mali-T658
    • Mali-T678
  • PowerVR SGX Series 5:
    • SGX520
    • SGX530
    • SGX531
    • SGX535
    • SGX540
    • SGX545
  • PowerVR SGX Series 5XT:
    • SGX543MP1-16
    • SGX544MP1-16
    • SGX554MP1-16
  • PowerVR SGX Series 6:
    • G6200
    • G6230
    • G6400
    • G6430
    • G6600
  • 2D graphics:
    • GC300
    • GC350
  • 3D graphics:
    • GC400
    • GC800
    • GC1000
    • GC2000
    • GC4000
  • ULP GeForce (Tegra 2/3)
  • 74-core GeForce (Tegra 4)

For each company the GPU are sorted by increasing processing power (e.g. Mali-T604 faster than Mali-400 MP, SGX535 faster than SGX531 etc…), and I did not include some older generations. As you can see there are many choices already, but you also need to take into account different number of cores (e.g. Mali-400 can have 1, 2 or 4 cores), process technology, and different operating frequencies chosen by SoC manufacturers for a given GPU, so that makes it even more complicated. That’s why I’m going to focus on one core for each GPU based on commonly used SoC: Rockchip RK3066 (Mali-400 MP4), Freescale i.MX6 (GC2000), AllWinner A31/ OMAP 5430 (SGX544 MP2), and Tegra 3 T30 (ULP Geforce).

Vivante has a product brief with a nice comparison table for their GPUs.

Vivante CPU Comparison_table

I’m going to use part for this table as base for performance comparison. For other GPUs, I’ll need to dig into the companies’ website:

Mali-400 MP4 PowerVR SGX544MP2 GC2000 Tegra 3 GPU
Frequency 240 MHz to 533 MHz 532 MHz 528MHz (600 MHz shader) 520 MHz
Shader Core 4 8 4 12
Geometry Rate 44M Tri/s for 1 core @ 400 MHz 70 M Tri/s per core @ 400 MHz 100 M Tri/s (Freescale claims 200 M Tri/s in i.MX6, i.MX6 Reference Manual: 88 Mtri/s,… go figure)
Textured Pixel Rate 1.6G Pix/s for 1 core @ 400 MHz 1 G Pix/s per core @ 200 MHz 1.25 G Pix/s (i.MX6 RM: 1.066G pixels/sec)
Core Processing 7.2 GFLOPS @ 200 MHz 12.8 GFLOPS @ 200 MHz
(34 GFLOPS @ 532 MHz)
24 GFLOPS (21.6 GFLOPS
 in i.MX6)
7.2 GFLOPS @ 300MHz
Antutu 3.x 2D: 1338
3D: 2338
Resolution: 1280×672
Device: MK808 (Android 4.1.1)
2D: 1058
3D: 4733
Resolution: 1024×768
Device: Onda V812 (Android 4.1.1)
2D: 733
3D: 1272
Resolution: 1280×672
Device: Hi802 (Android 4.0.4)
2D: 814
3D: 2943
Resolution: 800×1205
Device: Nexus 7 (Android 4.2.1)
Silicon Area 4×4.7mm2 ?  – 6.9 mm2  –
Process 65nm LP or GP 40nm TSMC 40nm LP 40nm
API support OpenGL ES 1.1 & 2.0
OpenVG 1.1
OpenGL ES 2.0 and OpenGL ES 1.1 + Extension Pack
OpenVG 1.1 enabling Flash and SVG
PVR2D for legacy 2D Support (BLTs, ROP2/3/4)
OpenWF enabling advanced compositing
OpenCL Embedded for GP-GPU
OpenGL ES 1.1/2.0/Halti

OpenCL 1.1 EP
OpenVG 1.1
DirectFB 1.4
GDI/Direct2D
X11/EXA
DirectX 11 9.3
OpenGL ES 1.1/2.0
OpenVG 1.1
EGL 1.4
Operating System support Android
Linux
Linux, Symbian and Android
Microsoft WinCE
RTOS on request
Android
Linux
Windows
QNX
Android
Windows 8

There are all sort of numbers on the Internet, and it’s quite difficult to make sure the reported numbers are accurate, so if you can provide corrections, leave them in the comments section. For API and OS support, I mainly copied and pasted what I got from the companies’ website. I failed to get much information on Tegra 3 GPU, most probably because it’s just used in house by Nvidia, and they don’t need to release that much information [Update: I got Antutu 3.0.3 since then, Weak 2D performance, and pretty good 3D performance on Nexus 7 tablet]. So I’ll leave it out for the rest of the comparison. When we look at Geometry rates GC2000 appears to be the slowest (if 88 Mtri/s is the right number), followed by Mali-400 MP4. I’m a bit confused by textured pixel rate, because I don’t know if this scales with the number of core or not. Mali-400 MP4 appears to be the slower GPU when it comes to GFLOPS, most probably because both GC2000 and SGX544MP2 support OpenCL 1.1, but this is currently not that important since not that many applications can support GPGPU. Antutu results show Mali-400 has the best 2D performance, followed by SGX544MP2 and Vivante GC355/GC320 ( 2D is not handled by GC2000 in i.MX6), but for 3D the PowerVR GPU is clearly in the lead, with Mali-400 MP4 getting half the performance, and GC2000 half the performance of the ARM Mali GPU according to Antutu 3.0.3.

So when it comes to 2D/3D graphics performance, we should not expect Freescale i.MX6 quad core Cortex A9 processor to outperform Rockchip RK3066 dual core Cortex A9 processor, and AllWinner A31 provides excellent graphics performance even if it features slower Cortex A7 cores (4 of them).

Support CNX Software - Donate via PayPal or become a Patron on Patreon

52
Leave a Reply

avatar
52 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
2 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
23 Comment authors
vikranttorstenbeerendlauwersTheguyukKern Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
onebir
Guest
onebir

Maybe you could explain a bit about the Linux compatibility issues? If Mali supports the OpenGL and OpenVG APIs, why can’t picUntu use it for graphics acceleration? & why is there a need for someone to develop open source drivers (Lima). Which (if any) GPUs are *really* compatible with Linux (eg allowing Linux to use them for HD video & 3D graphics)?

Dan
Guest
Dan

Granted they don’t often appear in low end stuff but no Qualcomm Adreno ? they are a pretty big one to omit & their GPU’s are top of the line. Not surprising given they are ex-ATI as AMD sold off the ATI embedded division years ago to Qualcomm, what a mistake that was.

The upcoming Adreno 330 is 50% faster than the Adreno 320 which easily beats the Tegra 3.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6112/qualcomms-quadcore-snapdragon-s4-apq8064adreno-320-performance-preview

onebir
Guest
onebir

@cnxsoft
Well, if you don’t completely understand it, my chances are… limited. Thanks! 🙂

xranby
Guest

@cnxsoft
First i would like to point out that you have missed Broadcom who design the VideoCore line in your list of ARM GPU manufacturers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VideoCore

One source of incompatibility of drivers between operatin systems is hidden inside the libEGL.
The libEGL.so (the library that you use to initialize OpenGL ES) is implemented differently on Android and X11 GNU/Linux machines and on the Dispmanx GNU/Linux RaspberryPi.

EGL API background:
It is common and allowed by the EGL spec that libEGL EGLNativeWindowType differ for OpenGL ES implementations across operating systems, for example:
On Windows EGLNativeWindowType is a “HWND” datastructure.
On Linux/Android EGLNativeWindowType is a “ANativeWindow*” datastructure pointer.
On Linux/X11 EGLNativeWindowType is a “Window” datastructure.
and so on…
On The Raspbeery Pi using a Linux/Broadcom Videocore IV EGLNativeWindowType is a “EGL_DISPMANX_WINDOW_T” datastructure.
http://www.khronos.org/egl
http://elinux.org/RPi_VideoCore_APIs

This means that if you try to use a libEGL and OpenGL ES built for Android you will get an exception on X11 that libEGL is unable to connect OpenGL ES render output to the X11 native window surface.

misko
Guest
misko

@cnxsoft
After all somebody on odroid forum try to get A10 mali drivers on exynos mali
http://odroid.foros-phpbb.com/t2051-working-mali-400-opengl-es-acceleration
and
it look like it works

EARL CAMERON
Guest

this is similar to what I have been doing, here http://blog.thinkteletronics.com/all-mobile-socsolutions/
also sgx 544mp2, I dont think it hit 136Gflops, most likely 30-30Gflops

EARL CAMERON
Guest

@Dan
I dont think selling of the mobile division was a bad move, look at gcn, that scales well[power and perf], to even ulv parts like the amd temash apu

notzed
Guest
notzed

@onebir
lima is about developing a free software driver for the gpu. The gpu is a programmable processor just like a cpu, so graphics drivers are just as much software as a compiler is. A binary blob has all the problems associated with a binary blob: bugs can’t be fixed, long-term support is questionable, etc.

The reason opencl isn’t used on android is google have their own crappy alternative and don’t like using standards in general – a typical attitude from the over-qualified technicians who work there.

kamejoko
Guest
kamejoko

@EARL CAMERON
Did you see @200MHz and 136Gflops @532MHz

1.21 jigga watts
Guest
1.21 jigga watts

PowerVR SGX544MP2
136 GFLOPS
744.8M Tri/s
@532MHz

woohaa 😉
Really bad typo, huh? 😉
(its around 34GFLOPS
and less than 200MTri/s can’t remember the exact number there )

Simon
Guest
Simon

@cnxsoft

That page at the Malidevelopers website says:

“Note that these components are not a complete driver stack. To build a functional OpenGL ES or OpenVG driver you need access to the full source code of the Mali GPU DDK, which is provided under the standard ARM commercial licence to all Mali GPU customers. For a complete integration of the Mali GPU DDK with the X11 environment refer to the Integration Guide supplied with the Mali GPU DDK.”

It looks like the fault of ARM, not helping create the complete driver stack, and blocking with the Mali GPU DDK license issue. This is not something that every SoC manufacturer should try to solve. ARM should solve for all their SoC licensees.

trackback

[…] primeiro update do Galaxy Camera. Comparando as GPUs móveis de ARM, Imagination Technologies, Vivante e nVidia. Acessando o Dropbox a partir do gerenciador de […]

m][sko
Guest
m][sko

cnxsoft :
@misko
Nice. Do you know what “it cant use all PP blocks inside Mali-400″ means? Is it just because Mali-400 only use one core in A10, so we can’t use all the cores inside the Mali-400 MP4 GPU present in Exynos 4412?

from dmseg
Mali PP: Creating Mali PP core: Mali-400 PP

it really looks like GPU core

trackback

[…] Via: cnx-software […]

Luc Verhaegen
Guest

As the actual main developer of the lima driver, i have some data to add here.

The mali-400 is a split shader design. 1 vertex shader (GP, geometry processor), and 1-4 fragment shaders (PP, pixel processor).

On the odroid-x2, they manage to clock the mali to 533MHz.

The GP manages 30MTris at 275MHz, so at 400MHz this translates to 43.6MTris, at 533 (which kind of matches the others) you hit 58.1MTris. The PP manages one pixel per core per clock. 1.6GPix at 4 cores at 400Mhz (so 400MPix per core), or 2.133GPix at 533Mhz. A rather amazing number compared to the competition, and exactly the reason why the exynos4 was such a great performer in the mobile space where the number of triangles tends to be low.

On the A10, there is only a mali400MP1, so 1GP and 1PP. The binary driver which we got for it has apparently been built to support only 1 PP, and apparently ignores the other 3PPs reported by the exynos kernel. Now this single PP has to work the whole display on his own, quadrupling the number of PPs, in a real world test i have here, will give4x the performance if the CPU can feed the triangles fast enough (the rockchip dual A9s will happily do that in comparison to the single A8 of my current favourite SoC, the allwinner A10).

Yes, SGX MPx rules atm. But throwing more silicon at the problem is not the best solution for the mobile space, especially not with a GPU which is a management and synchronization nightmare even on a single core.

As for the lima driver, keep your eyes peeled at FOSDEM.

trackback

[…] al excelente articulo de CNX-Soft vamos a intentar aportar algo de luz sobre el tema de las GPU que montan los SOC mas comunes en […]

onebir
Guest
onebir

@Luc Verhaegen
Thanks for working on Lima – having non-crippled Linux on (at least some) Arm processors will help a lot of people 🙂

For people like me who’ve never heard of FOSDEM, it’s on 2 & 3rd Feb this year:
https://fosdem.org/2013/
So not even a very long wait 🙂

sky770
Guest
sky770

@Luc Verhaegen

+1 Great info!
Thanks.. 🙂

trackback

[…] over 30 GFlops @ 300 MHz, G6100 appears to outperform  any other ARM GPUs at this frequency. G6100 is the low-end version of the Series 6 series, and we don’t know […]

trackback

[…] se a specifiche potrebbe fare sfracelli…) qui trovate un confronto interessante sulle gpu: http://www.cnx-software.com/2013/01/…a-geforce-ulp/ Ultima modifica di bilukez; Oggi a 11:13 Rispondi […]

trackback

[…] RK3188 has a quad core ARM Mali-400 MP4 GPU while the A31 has a PowerVR SGX544MP2 GPU. There is a benchmark posted on cnx-software.com that tries to compare the Mali-400 MP4 with the PowerVR SGX544MP2 as well as the GC2000 and the […]

trackback

[…] with PowerVR’s SGX544 MP2 graphics processor unit (GPU) instead of ARM’s stock Mali400. CNX-software has a very good comparison of the GPUs inside these […]

trackback

[…] GPU's in den SoCs: ARM Mali400 vs Vivante GC2000 vs PowerVRSGX544 vs Nvidia Geforce Tegra3 ULP GPUs Comparison: ARM Mali vs Vivante GCxxx vs PowerVR SGX vs Nvidia Geforce ULP Habe es erst gestern gesehen: ARMs Mali-450-GPU kann 4K-Videos wiedergeben Die MALI450MP8 @250MHz […]

trackback

[…] ARM-designed Mali-400 MP4 GPU set, Freescale chose the Vivante GC2000. Based on testing from cnx-software.com, the two options used here offer strange results. On the AnTuTu tests, the Mali-400 MP4 clearly […]

trackback

[…] to cnx-software.com, the PowerVR SGX544MP2 delivers a geometry rate of 70MTriangle/second at 400MHz, nearly double the […]

trackback

[…] kommt eine PowerVR SGX544MP2 GPU mit acht Cores und einer durchaus passablen 3D-Performance. In Sachen RAM (Arbeitsspeicher) verbaut […]

trackback

[…] -Source * Screen resolution * No NFC support Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8-inch Cons: * Basically the SOC on Galaxy SII clocked @ 1.5Ghz * No NFC support * Screen resolution * Price Overall : "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist" Spoiler: […]

trackback

[…] le site cnx-software.com, le GPU PowerVR SGX544MP2 offre des performances en calcul géométrique (geometry rate) de 70M […]

Hardik P
Guest
Hardik P

which graphics is better 16 core or PowerVR SGX544?

Alex
Guest
Alex

“So when it comes to 2D/3D graphics performance, we should not expect Freescale i.MX6 quad core Cortex A9 processor to outperform Rockchip RK3066 dual core Cortex A9 processor, and AllWinner A31 provides excellent graphics performance even if it features slower Cortex A7 cores (4 of them).”

Sorry but i do not get this one. Does that mean SGX544MP2>Mali400MP4>Tegra3>GC200?

The reason why i ask is, because i want to know,wich chip would be better for gaming/emulating:
RockChip 3188, Quad Core, 1.8GHz (cortex A9 CPU, ARM mali400 mp4 GPU)
or
All Winner A31s, Quad Core, 1GHz (CPU:cortex A7, GPU:Power VR SGX 544 mp2)
Greetz!

m][sko
Guest
m][sko

@Alex
SGX is your friend

look at iPad/iPhone GPU perf. and anybody else

Alex
Guest
Alex

@m][sko

I see… but a difference in 0.8 ghz in cpu is massive. and in the apple stuff its not exactly this gpu: http://www.android-hilfe.de/attachments/onda-v972-forum/161044d1358373694-9-onda-v972-quadcore-cpu-2gb-ram-vr-sgx544mp2-gpu-powervr_gpu_compare.jpg

im really confused, the more i read about this topic, the less i understand^^

can you describe me the advantages, and disadvantages in both cases, ty

vivek
Guest
vivek

PowerVR SGX544 vs nvidia Tegra 4
wich is better?

Dave
Guest
Dave

I want to buy a cheap tablet that I can play games on. So far the choices of GPU within my budget are PowerVR SGX544MP2 and mali 400mp2. Which GPU is better? All these numbers are confusing. I need an answer in plain English.

Dave
Guest
Dave

@cnxsoft
You are awesome! Thanks.

trackback

[…] from 2013, and even 2012 would have made it to the top 10 list, including my now-somewhat-outdated comparison table of GPU in ARM SoCs, a simplified method to install Rockchip drivers in Windows, a rooting method for WM8800 tablets, […]

tttubi
Guest
tttubi

Gc1000 plus vs mali 450 mp4? Can help me someone with an opinion?

Tom
Guest
Tom

Would the Mali-450 mp4 outperform the PowerVR SGX544 MPS? Thanks

Kern
Guest
Kern

@Tom

Only the single core (cluster) version of PowerVR SGX544 MP as use in chipset MT6589 would be outperform by Mali-450 MP4. The dual core version (PowerVRSGX544 MP2) however will offer similar performance to the named Mali GPU.

Kern
Guest
Kern

@Dave
To clarify, PowerVR SGX544MP2 is made up of 8 pixel shaders and 4 vertex shaders, Mali-400MP2 is made up of 2 pixel shaders and 1 vertex shader. So PowerVR GPU would definitely perform better because it has more shaders. Having more shaders means a GPU can render a frame better than one with less shaders.

Theguyuk
Guest
Theguyuk

To make things easy for non technical customers, buyers, the Android market needs a real world game test. Like the Doom, Quake series gave on the PC. A high end game that has features that push the graphics in a free demo, shareware version.

The Android TV box lower market has the potential to be the real micro console. We need beyong Riptide GP2 test. For HD gaming below £40 GBP price boxes.

beerendlauwers
Guest
beerendlauwers