Intel Atom Z3735F mini PC Power Consumption in Android

I’ve already measured power consumption running Antutu and playing a 4K video on Rockchip RK3288 and Amlogic S812 platform, as described in “Power Consumption of Amlogic S812 and Rockchip RK3288 TV Boxes“, and now that I have an Intel Bay Trail-T mini PC running Android 4.4 with Wintel W8, I was interested in comparing its power consumption to the ARM platform.

[Update: I forgot to mention measurements have all been done @ ~5V.]

Wintel W8 Power Consumption Profile (Click to Enlarge)
Vertical Axis: Amperes; Horizontal Axis: Sample number (every 0.5 second)

The test normally consists in several steps:

  1. Boot the device
  2. Run the latest Antutu benchmark
  3. Connect a USB hard drive
  4. Play a 4K video in Kodi from the hard drive
  5. Diconnect the hard drive
  6. Power off the device

But since the current draw was a little to high at times, I got a few issues with my setup. First, I had to boot twice hence the “Power On 1” and “Power On 2” strings on the chart, then Antutu 3D graphics benchmark did not fully complete, but we still got enough data to evaluate power consumption, and for some reasons the video would not play from the USB hard drive, so I played the video from SAMBA instead. We can see that the peak amperage is about 2A (~10 Watts), and power off current is less than 0.1A. But let’s include the chart for the ARM platform for comparison sake.

Eny M8S (Amlogic S802) Power Consumption Chart (Click to Enlarge)
Vertical Axis: Amperes; Horizontal Axis: Sample number (every 0.5 second)
Open Hour Chameleon (RK3288) Power Consumption Chart (Click to Enlarge)
Vertical Axis: Amperes; Horizontal Axis: Sample number (every 0.5 second)

While Amlogic S812 averages around 800 mA, and Rockchip RK3288 is closer to 900 mA on aggregate, the Intel platform draws a bit more current at 1.05A on average. It’s only during 3D graphics tests than ARM and Intel platform are evenly matched. Idle power is also better for ARM Amlogic S812 idling at 400 mA, RK3288 at 500 mA, and Atom Z3735F at 600 mA. However, Wintel W8 design appears to be better than Open Hour Chameleon and Eny M8S when it comes to standby / power off power consumption, and for some reasons RK3288 consumes a lot of power during multi-threaded floating-point operations.

Intel Atom Z3735F vs Amlogic S812 vs Rockchip RK3288 (Click to Enlarge)

The tests for the three platform have not completed in the same amount of time, but I’ve still superposed all three charts into one, and we can clearly see the multi-core floating-point anomaly for RK3288, and that the Intel platform appears to consume more power than others once the hard drive is connected.

Share this:

Support CNX Software! Donate via cryptocurrencies or become a Patron on Patreon

6 Replies to “Intel Atom Z3735F mini PC Power Consumption in Android”

  1. but then again the only relevant part would be current during idle or standby, since that’s probably that what those devices mostly are: idle or in standby, with about 2-4h/day playing movies or such.

  2. Nice charts. Relatively speaking — I’d say the power consumption is pretty comparable across the board. And I agree with the above poster, idle/standby is the most critical part for battery life.

    All things considered, I’d say Intel doesn’t have much to apologize for here.

  3. Just a note: Power is measured in Watt, not Ampere. A graph showing amperes as a measure of power is meaningless without a voltage (and its waveform). Is it the current on the primary side of the PSU? At 110V or 230V? Is it on the secondary? At 3.3V, 5V, 12V, 19V? Is it the internal reading of some PMU at the CPU’s core voltage (0.8V, 1.25V, 1.8V, …)? Is it the peak current between two measurements or the average?

    Measuring power correctly isn’t easy, but *at least* give a reference like: Amps@5V or better, multiply the Amps with the Voltage label the axis with Watt 😉

  4. Was the power graph inclusive of the USB HDD power load? The wintel box seems to settle back to 1 amp and there isn’t an increase in the load that I see from the HDD. The ARM devices seem to do a better job of powering off the silicon areas in the video tests than the wintel does.

    I know that Intel’s power technology is supposedly diffused, where the ARM is partitioned to allow wholesale power switching of areas of the silicon at a time. That might lead to the results you have.

    At a prior job, where were problems with power spikes if too much power was applied at ones in adjoining silicon areas.

    Is the Intel platform 14nm or 20 or 22nm technology?

  5. @John Doe
    Yes, you’re right. I should have mentioned that all platforms are supplied with 5V.

    Voltage will also vary during measure simply because there’s an extra resistance in series in the circuit while doing measurement, so I guess we can’t really simply multiply by 5.

    @jim stephens
    Yes, that’s the complete power usage (after power supply), to USB HDD is also included.

    Intel Atom Z3735F processor is manufactured with 22nm process.

  6. @Dr. Azrael Tod
    @Jon Q. Public
    That’s true that since these device are in standby or off most the time, these are more related to the overall system design that the SoC itself. Many ARM TV boxes don’t implement a proper power off mode, so in that case Wintel W8 is more power efficient.

    It also depend on the peripheral you have attached, as some board don’t turn off USB ports in standby mode, so this adds to power consumption too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *