Intel Atom T5500 & T5700 Processors Architecture and (Estimated) Benchmarks

Orange Pi Development Boards

Intel announced their Joule Compute Module yesterday, but did not provide that many details about the new Intel Atom T5500 and T5700 processors used in the module. Liliputing got some more details with slides from an IDF16 presentation entitled “Accelerating Innovation With Next-Generation Intel® Atom™ Processor-Based Platform” that now require authentication for download, but we have the most important slide already starting with the block diagram.

Intel_Atom_T5500-T5700_Architecture

Intel Atom T5500 and T5700 SoC are both quad core Atom x7 processor, but they are based on Intel Goldmont architecture, as used in Celeron & Pentium Apollo Lake processor to be featured in laptop and mini PCs, and embed a newer 18EU Intel Gen9 graphics and media GPU with Quick Sync technology for 4K video encoding and decoding using H.265, H.264, and VP9/VP8 codecs. They also feature various peripherals and features that you’d expected in an IoT processor including:

  • a Sensor Hub processor
  • a Power management unit
  • HDMI video output, MIPI DSI display interface
  • I2S audio
  • USB 3.0 and 2.0 ports
  • PCI Express
  • I2C, UART, PWM, and GPIOs
  • Up to 6x MIPI CSI cameras
  • eMMC 5.0 and SDIO 3.0 storage support
  • LPDDR4 CoPoP memory

They did not integrated WiFi and Bluetooth inside the chip, but instead relying on the PCI Express interface to add wireless modules such as Intel WCS8270, and the USB 3.0 interface may be used to interface with the upcoming Intel Realsense ZR300 camera for 3D depth sensing.

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Atom T5700
Atom x5-Z8500 vs Atom T5700

While Intel Atom x5 processors are used in tablet and mini PCs, and the new Atom T5500/T5700 processors target high end IoT and robotics applications, the company still compared the performance of both processors, and T5700 is 41 to 56% faster in their estimation of the scores in three benchmarks (SPECint single & multi-threaded, and GFXbench 3.0 – T-Rex). For a given power budget, performance is also shown to be greater in T5x00 processors.

Prices will likely be significantly higher, as Intel probably left the mobile market due to razor thin margins, and while the technical specifications would allow Atom T5x00 processors to find their ways into tablets, 2-in-1 hybrid laptops, and mini PCs, this should not be expected.

Support CNX Software - Donate via PayPal or become a Patron on Patreon

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
3 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
TLSmeagainRajib GhoshrebeLGiorgio Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Giorgio
Guest
Giorgio

This will be perfect solution for small multimedia pc devices

rebeL
Guest
rebeL

So, whats up with intel, they said, the name atom won’t to be continued. And every week there is a new atom, with slow power…
Sorry, wake me up when amd-zen-apu is available, and intel goes hurry up with a powerfull graphic wich could be fanless cooled, AND don’t cost more than 80 Dollars.

Rajib Ghosh
Guest

At approx. $350 for the dev-kits, these products are dead in the water. They are as expensive as full-blown Laptops and Desktop PCs. They maybe useful for a very small niche market only. Kinda like the market segment that is at the intersection of a hundred sets.

meagain
Guest

T5500 is already a product name for a Core 2 Duo mobile CPU. Really Intel?

TLS
Guest
TLS

@Rajib Ghosh
That’s normal for dev kits you know. Some router dev kits can cost as much or more.