ODYSSEY-STM32MP157C SBC Feature STMicro STM32MP157C Cortex-A7/M4 SoC

ODYSSEY- STM32MP157CSeeed Studio has been working on a single board computer powered by STMicro STM32MP157C Arm Cortex-A7/M4 microprocessor, comprised of the Raspberry Pi inspired NPi-STM32MP157C baseboard, and SoM-STM32MP157C system-on-module.


SOM-STM32MP157C Module
Click to Enlarge

Module specifications:

  • MPU (1) – STMicro STM32MP157C dual-core Arm Cortex-A7 processor @ 650 MHz, and Arm Cortex-M4F MCU
  • System Memory (2) – 512MB DDR3 RAM
  • Storage (4) – 4GB eMMC flash
  • Host Connectors – 3x 70-pin board-to-board connectors with HDMI, USB, Gigabit Ethernet, audio GPIOs, etc…
  • Misc – Power and USER LEDs
  • PMU (3) – STPMIC1A power management IC
  • Dimensions – 38mm x 38mm

The module is said to targets consumer and industrial applications, white goods, medical equipment, and wearable devices.

NPi-STM32MP157C baseboard


Click to Enlarge

Key features and specifications:

  • SoM Support – Compatible with SOM-STM32MP157C described above
  • Storage – MicroSD card slot
  • Display I/F – 1x MIPI DSI interface
  • Audio – 3.5mm audio jack, WM8960 audio codec
  • Camera I/F – 1x DVP camera interface
  • Networking & Wireless Connectivity
    • 1x Gigabit Ethernet (RJ45)
    • 2.4 GHz 802.11b/g/n WiFi 4 and Bluetooth 4.1 (Ampak AP6236)
  • USB – 2x USB 2.0 host ports, 1x USB 2.0 Type-C port
  • Expansion
    • 40-pin Raspberry Pi GPIO connector
    • 2x Grove connectors (GPIO & I2C)
  • Debugging – 3-pin debug UART header
  • Misc
    • Reset LED, 3x user LEDs, power LED
    • Reset and user buttons, dial code key
    • Boot selection switch (eMMC or SD card) (12)
    • RTC battery header (14)
  • Power Supply – 12V to 24V/2A via DC jack (12V recommended) or 5V/3A via USB Type-C port
  • Temperature Range – 0 to 75°C
Click to Enlarge

Software, Documentation, and Pricing

The company provides code samples with an Arduino sketch running on their Seeeduino V4 board connected to a CAN Bus shield, and a Python script running Qt on the STM32MP1 SBC, as well as PDF schematics for both the baseboard and SoM, and documentation such as the pinout diagrams for all connectors and headers on Github. Note documentation is available both in Chinese and English, just click on the “EN” files to get the English versions. The board is supposed to run Linux, but I could not find OS images nor source code at the time of writing.

Seeed Studio is not selling ODYSSEY-STM32MP157C SBC directly on their own online store just yet, but we can find the board on Digikey and Mouser for around $27 for the SoM, and $58.5 for the SoM and baseboard. As I understand it, both companies refer to NPi-STM32MP157C as the SOM + baseboard kit instead of just the baseboard, and there’s no mention of ODYSSEY-STM32MP157C.

Share this:
FacebookTwitterHacker NewsSlashdotRedditLinkedInPinterestFlipboardMeWeLineEmailShare

Support CNX Software! Donate via cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or purchase goods on Amazon or Aliexpress

ROCK 5 ITX RK3588 mini-ITX motherboard

12 Replies to “ODYSSEY-STM32MP157C SBC Feature STMicro STM32MP157C Cortex-A7/M4 SoC”

    1. I don’t think it’ll ever be cheap enough for a board that’s on the same price level as the orangepi etc. Despite the low-end specs these SoCs aren’t designed for the e-waste market.

        1. You aren’t just paying for the raw cost of the chip. Those SoCs actually have people mainlining and maintaining them.

          1. Yes, sure. But then have a look at the Jetson nano compare the specs, the price, the middleware and BSP support. It’s almost the same price (SOM + baseboard). $85.5 for MP1 and $89 for Jetson. What makes MP1 so much better compared to nano?

          2. jetson nano is a dev kit from the vendor that’s probably sold at or below cost as a promotional item.

            Parts like this and the i.mx6 etc are going in stuff that needs something better than a microcontroller with a decent supply chain, long term availability, vendor support etc.
            You pay a premium for that.

          3. I think this discussion doesn’t make much sense. Depending your use case there are many cheaper alternatives with good support and all the things you’ve mentioned. Are you ab amateur that wants an SBC then go with nano, rockpi or many other boards. If you talk about developing a product, even then there are better solutions at almost any MOQ. There are dozens different use cases and I can’t think of one that the MP1 is better in that price range, especially with those specs. Maybe I’m wrong and you’re right.

          4. It doesn’t make sense for the e-waste market like the <$15 orangepi boards but if you have a little project where being able to compile mainline and have most stuff working including suspend/resume (not saying it actually works right now, I haven't checked) is important it might be worth the extra money. Cheapish imx6ull boards exist though so I'm not too sure there is much of a market.

            For actual products if you're lucky enough to still be selling something in 10 years you'll be glad you don't have to maintain a severely bit rotted android patched kernel that was 3 or 4 android releases out of dat from the start. Mainlining doesn't guarantee that it'll still be in there in 10 years but it's a world away from allwinners etc SDK drop and run.

            TL;DR; these chips are cheap to make, cortex A7 with memory is in the $3 range, but there's a bit more to it than just jamming a die into an encapsulation for things that aren't meant to be used in throw away tablets etc.

          5. Therefore, it’s only for a limited projects, that need low price, main kernel support and 10 years availability. That’s a very small market. Most of the products have 2-5 years max life and most of them don’t require mainline kernel. For example, most of the imx6 & imx8 SoCs don’t have mainline support. They don’t have preempt-rt kernels. Still they dominate the market. Anyway, I really can’t think of any product that I would choose this SoC, but maybe some people do consider this.

            Although, I like ST and I’m using a lot of their MCUs, I believe they should either aim to bigger CPU in the same cost or have that much cheper. Also the support in the forums is really bad. Even nvidia (which also sucks) has much better support in their forums for Tegras. You hardly get any answer from ST engineers in the forums and if you’re not a big client you don’t have any access to their support. I think TI has the best support for that matter. Just ask a question for any IC in the forum and probably the guy who designed it will answer to you in a couple of days.

          6. >Therefore, it’s only for a limited projects, that need low price,
            >main kernel support and 10 years availability.

            Well for me, if I didn’t already own hundreds of single core cortex A7s, I might buy this because maybe it presents something new to learn that might be useful at work/with clients in the future.
            Having an M4 in there is meant as an RT co-processor and not just a power management controller means there’s some potential to learn some stuff that isn’t there on your average Chinese quad core A7 thingy. I’m not sure why seeed made this board though.

            >Anyway, I really can’t think of any product that I would choose this SoC,
            >but maybe some people do consider this.

            The problem there is there is that it’s really hard to actually know what people are developing into their products most of the time because of strict corporate secrecy rules etc. If ST discontinue this and put out a last order notice we’ll know it’s been a flop but until then someone is probably using it.

            >Although, I like ST and I’m using a lot of their MCUs,
            >I believe they should either aim to bigger CPU in the same cost or have that much cheper.

            IMHO I think the price will come down like it did for the i.mx6ull. It’ll never be allwinner cheap but maybe enough to make the jump from some of the more insane microcontrollers.

            >You hardly get any answer from ST engineers in the forums
            >and if you’re not a big client you don’t have any access to their support.

            In those cases mainline support is even more important really as it provides a lot of missing gaps in the documentation and so on and it’s a lot harder to get code with undocumented magic numbers and other voodoo into mainline. I’d actually like it if more kernel drivers made an effort to document how the hardware works like MAME does so that going forward we’d have code that doesn’t rely on long lost or NDA-walled datasheets to understand.

          7. Your numbers are wrong. MP1 SoM + baseboard are $58.5, not $85.5 as you write. So it is not “almost the same price”. For use in standard temperature conditions and with applications, where you don’t need an integrated MCU, the Jetson board still looks like the better choice. I’d not go as far as calling the MP1 an uncompetitive chip.

  1. What’s weird about Mouser’s page is their offer’s Frankenstein nature: what to make of the name “Seeed Studio NPi-STM32MP157C i.MX 8M Mini SoM+Baseboard”? The description and front and back layout pictures are completely different from Digikey’s page and describe indeed an i.MX 8M Mini design. Also, on the “back layout” picture, the board is actually named “NPi – i.MX 8M Mini” and there’s a PCIe interface, which STM32MP157C lacks. Maybe Seeed Studio has more boards in development?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Khadas VIM4 SBC
Khadas VIM4 SBC