PineNote Developer Edition mainline Linux e-Reader is now available for $399

Pine64 community has been on a tear in 2022, with the launch of the PineNote Developer Edition Linux e-reader following the availability of the PinePhone keyboard case and PinePhone Pro Explorer Edition Linux smartphone in the last 2-3 weeks.

So far a limited number of PineNote prototypes had been sent to developers, but it’s now possible to order the PineNote Developer Edition for $399 directly on the Pine64 store. As its name implies, the e-Reader is not ready for end-users, but recent progress with mainline Linux makes it suitable for developers and enthusiasts who want to play around with the device knowing much more work is needed to make it a usable device.

Pine64 PineNoteThe specifications remain the same as in the initial PineNote announcement:

  • SoC – Rockchip RK3566 quad-core A55 processor @ 1.8 GHz with Arm Mali-G52 EE GPU, 0.8 TOPS NPU (AI accelerator)
  • System Memory – 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM
  • Storage – 128GB eMMC flash
  • Display – 10.3-inch panel with 1404×1872 resolution (227 DPI), 16 levels of grayscale, front light with cool (white) to warm (amber) light adjustment, capacitive glass layer for finger touch-based input, scratch-resistant hardened glass, and a Wacom electromagnetic resonance layer (EMR) for EMR pen input (included).
  • Audio – 4x microphones, stereo loudspeaker
  • Connectivity – Dual-band 802.11b/g/n/ac WiFi 5, Bluetooth 5.0
  • USB – 1x USB-C 2.0 host port for fast charging and data
  • Sensor – G-Sensor for portrait and landscape sensing
  • Battery – 4,000mAh/14.8Wh LiPi battery
  • Power Supply – 5V/3A via USB-C port with USB PD support (15W)
  • Dimensions – 191.1 x 232.5 x 7.4mm
  • Weight – 438 grams
  • Materials – magnesium alloy inner frame, plastic back cover

The PineNote Developer Edition ships with a USB-A to USB-C charging cable, Quick Start User Manual, an EMR Pen, and a protective cover.

Alpine Linux PineNote

The developer edition only ships with a bootloader, no operating system, so you’d have to install, or even build, your own. The photo above shows the PineNote running Alpine Linux v3.14 with Linux 5.16-rc7 (mainline), and a functioning DRM (Direct Rendering Manager) driver for the device’s e-ink controller and panel. It’s still an early version that uses the basic grayscale waveform, and support for optimized anti-ghosting waveforms, the fast monochrome waveform used for low-latency pen input, and the dithering waveform needed to watch videos is coming later on.

Still, this should allow developed to optimize programs for E-ink displays with notably the removal of animations, maximizing contrast, and checking whether the information conveyed through colors is still usable on a grayscale display

PineNote Arch Linux Arm
Arch Linux Arm + XFCE on PineNote

Software development support for PineNote has greatly been helped by earlier work on Quartz64 SBC, and the next Linux kernel release (Linux 5.17) should get USB OTG, touch screen, and audio playback. Pine64 community reports only the microphone array and Bluetooth are currently unsupported.

The “software releases” section of PineNote’s Wiki is currently empty simply stating “Not yet available”, so they are not kidding when saying the e-Reader is only for developers at this time, and instructions to build U-boot and the kernel from scratch, get a minimal rootfs, flash everything with a forked version of Rkdeveloptool can be found in a separate page of Pine64 wiki.

Via Pine64’s January Update.

Share this:
FacebookTwitterHacker NewsSlashdotRedditLinkedInPinterestFlipboardMeWeLineEmailShare

Support CNX Software! Donate via cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or purchase goods on Amazon or Aliexpress

ROCK Pi 4C Plus

16 Replies to “PineNote Developer Edition mainline Linux e-Reader is now available for $399”

    1. Well some users have long ago setup a RPi 4 8GB board with 512 GB SSD and Waveshare eink displays. The PCIe port supports 10 Gbps ethernet devices and also HifiBerry is one of the best DACs for such boards.

    1. RK3566/RK3568 are meant to be combined with Rockchip’s RK817/RK809 (PMIC, charge controller and Audio codec). So they are designed for mobile use cases.

      1. Thanks for the info tkaiser 🙂 Always appreciate your informative comments (the one on zswap/zram was really interesting)

        I guess my followup would be – is there a particular reason why these chips rarely end up in mobile devices like phones/tablets? (I can only think of the Pinephone) My mental association was with these non-mobile TV boxes

        1. > is there a particular reason why these chips rarely end up in mobile devices like phones/tablets?

          RK356x is rather new so it needs some time for Linux software support to mature if you’re keen on running Linux on these gadgets and not just Android + forward ported BSP kernel from hell.

          Both the original and Pro version rely on such SoC/PMIC combinations with mature Linux support at time of production (AKA ‘years after introduction’).

    2. > Should we expect good battery life?

      ARM SoCs contain at least one MCU designed amongst other things for deep sleep state (keeping the MCU alive while shutting everything else down). With RK’s BSP I would expect this to work OOB while with mainline it might be a long journey for this to work.

      Most probably Linux for PineNote with excellent battery life will be stuck to BSP kernel (4.19) but better wait for someone to comment who is actually into RK356x development.

      At least LCD+backlight that significantly lower a tablet’s battery life are no issue here.

  1. Not sure I see the point, lower resolution than a tablet and almost the same weight?

    eReaders at least are super lightweight

    1. > Not sure I see the point

      Imagine a concept called ‘being outside’ combined with ‘paperless’ 😉

      At least I used my Boox M92 (9.7″ display, 150 ppi, 520 grams) to read while sunbathing…

        1. Think about ordinary PDF or any other format that represents ‘static page layout’ and not ebook formats that automagically reflow on small screens.

          Only a few fraction of PDFs are prepared for accessibility/reflow which would allow to be displayed in a reasonable way on small displays. Majority of PDF works only in fullscreen mode so the higher the resolution and the larger the screen the better.

        2. The other thing it does well, and Kindle doesn’t do at all to my knowledge, is the same thing real paper is otherwise good for – namely handwriting. I’ve used an iPad with the Apple pen and a Samsung Chromebook with a stylus before, so this is all I can compare it to. Writing on e-paper is a distinctly different experience. I can’t really pin-point what sets it apart, but I suspect a combination of the following factors contribute to it: the stylus input appears nearly instantly; the stylus input is noticably less processed (more raw and imperfect) compared to devices with LCD panels; the perceived lack of depth between the stylus tip and digitizer; the matte surface of the panel, especially in a daylight environment without frontlight active; friction on the stylus when writing (think the matte screen coating is designed to create some friction when using the stylus). Whatever it is, your brain (or _my_ brain at least) finds it highly akin to writing on real paper. For sure, it isn’t exactly the same experience, but it is much more convincing than the LCD panels I’ve tried.

          To be clear, the experience I outlined above is currently only available on the Android image. Samuel Holland, the person behind the mainline-based Linux e-paper driver, tells me that much work is yet needed for handwritten text/ drawn content to appear instantly under Linux.

  2. I’ve been wanting a e-Reader but not from Amazon, because they are amazon, and this is a really cool product.

    But $399 for my country is loads of money so still gonna be waiting

  3. This 10.3 inches is still smaller than I’d like for sitting around reading arxiv.org pdf’s. Those are US letter size or A4, in either case about 14 inches diagonal.

    Also, has Pine ever shipped an actual finished product rather than a “developer edition” with incomplete software? $400 is pretty steep for a partway working device. I’m still more interested in the Inkplate 10, I would say. The same thing is going on with their phones and many other gadgets. Well I guess there is the Pinecil soldering iron.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Khadas VIM4 SBC
Khadas VIM4 SBC