Smaller & Faster than Raspberry Pi Zero: Meet NanoPi NEO ARM Linux Development Board

Raspberry Pi Zero has two noticeable attributes compared to other Raspberry Pi boards: it’s smaller and it’s cheaper. FriendlyARM has now designed another model for their NanoPi family, that about 12% smaller, although not quite as thin at all due to its Ethernet jack and USB connector, and much faster than Raspberry Pi Zero, with NanoPi NEO board powered by Allwinner H3 quad core processor.

NanoPi NEO specifications:

  • SoC – Allwinner H3 quad core Cortex A7 @ 1.2 GHz with an ARM Mali-400MP2 GPU up to 600 MHz
  • System Memory – 256 or 512 MB DDR3
  • Storage – micro SD card slot
  • Connectivity – 10/100M Ethernet
  • USB – 1x USB 2.0 host ports, 1x micro USB OTG port, 2x USB via headers
  • Expansion headers
    • 24-pin header with I2C, 2x UART, SPI, PWM, and power signals
    • 12-pin header with 2x USB, IR pin, microphone and Line OUT signals
  • Debugging – 4-pin header for serial console
  • Misc – Power and status LEDs
  • Power Supply – 5V/2A via micro USB port or VDD pin on headers.
  • Dimensions – 40 x 40 mm (Raspberry Pi Zero: 65mm × 30mm)

There aren’t any interfaces to connect an external display, so the board can only be used for headless applications. In case you need that board with low profile, you could probably unsolder the Ethernet jack and USB port, or if you buy in quantities, maybe the company could remove those for you.

The Wiki is still in construction, and for now only in Chinese, but we can find out that FriendlyARM provides Ubuntu-Core with Qt-Embedded for the board relying on Linux 3.4 legacy kernel. However, Allwinner H3 should get full mainline support in Linux 4.7 or 4.8, so I’m fully expecting the board to be supported in mainline kernel in a few months. The schematics (PDF), and header pin assignments are also available in the wiki.

NanoPi NEO is not yet for sale, but considering the larger NanoPi M1 board with the same processor sells for $11 + $5 shipping, I’d expect the new board to go for around $7 + $4 or $5 shipping, about the same price as I paid for Raspberry Pi Zero.

NanoPi NEO sells for $7.99 with 256 RAM, $9.99 with 512 RAM + shipping ($4 to my location).

Share this:

Support CNX Software! Donate via PayPal or cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or buy review samples

93 Replies to “Smaller & Faster than Raspberry Pi Zero: Meet NanoPi NEO ARM Linux Development Board”

  1. Well if you get your hands on one, do make sure to rate the current draw, then you’ll be able to compare it to an rpi zero.

    It could prove interesting but from my Orange Pi PC measurements, my board, the H3 chip, or poorly optimized armbian (i doubt that), is power hungry making the H3 a poor choice for battery powered portable systems.

    @Dr. Azrael Tod
    There’s no sign of POE in the schematics, not very surprising seeing the lack of power devices near the connector and no mention of POE support in the H3 datasheet.
    It takes advantage of the H3 Eth PHY so doesn’t require an external chip for 100Mbps Eth.

    You can always use an external poe board to split the signal/power.

    Hopefully we’ll see some s905x cheap boards, which has the same PHY integration.

  2. Interesting but they could easily do a version with HDMI, four micro USB ports ( helps with gram weight, smaller packet size cheaper in postage, in some countries ) and attach your own USB to Ethernet.

    But then they know their market. Wonder if Orange Pi and Banana Pi will launch something similair?

  3. @mdel
    FriendlyARM seems very interested in getting news about their board posted here, but they’ve never asked me to review their boards…

    Power consumption is interesting an interesting subject, and many tweaks are likely possible to optimize it. I don’t see PMIC, so I guess sleep mode is not possible, like on RPI Zero, but CHIP board supports it.

  4. Nice board.
    They miss to add soldering pad/pin out to choose Vcore between 1V and 1.35V, to choose the right cpu frequency for usage (more cpu power or low power solar system).
    Need to know the real price with shipping, if they act like Pi zero I stay on OP PC with real pmic and 1GB ram.

  5. The nice option is the easy way to put an heathink, by array of 10 H3 board 🙂
    I see already webhosting maker using that for dedicated server!
    Computer are cheap, now only coding software is an add value 🙂

  6. @boobipy @Fossxplorer
    arm dedicated hosting already exists, check scaleway, sub company of online.net, large french ISP.
    2.99e/month for 4cores / 2GB RAM / 50G SSD (not local).
    There’s not much details on the Arm chip they use but their hardware is custom made and probably has a custom broadcom chip.

    @AnRkey
    you can always hack a passive POE (not 48V but 5-6V on an unused twisted pair), as long as you don’t need Gbe.

    @maurer
    i agree Allwinner and the H3 are clearly lagging behind Amlogic on linux support. It’s my belief that it’ll stay a second choice for linux users.

    Those boards are only useful (and successful) if you get full support for the soc control in linux and working gpio libs.
    I bought the SPI cam module with my orange Pi PC, and coming from rpi with picamera python lib, it feels intensely painful to use that hardware.

  7. Now time to see what Orange Pi folks come up with. Final price will be the main criteria as H3 is universally supported by Armbian

  8. @boobipy
    I like it also if they put the processor on the bottom of the board, like the banana-pro. So You can use a metal bottom plate as base and put the board on it with some thermal paste between the SOC and the base plate. I did it this way with my DIY banana pro server. You can easily reuse the bolts (with springs) from an old CPU cooler.

  9. @zoobab

    Current state of H3 mainline support within Armbian is experimental. We don’t support it or provide an image for download yet. We actually made a prerelease image some time ago, but since people failed to read FAQ and keep asking “why, when…”, we removed it.

    You can try to build it within our build system, it should boot:

    Success:
    http://forum.armbian.com/index.php/topic/1180-orange-pi-lite-now-available/?p=12165
    Some unofficial test builds can be found within forum.

    For server usage it will be ready soon … with some delay due to summer vacations.

  10. It is a shame all H3 board makers don’t financially and technically support Armbian, surely a one stop software with support, instantly make their boards useful and saleable. Instead of all reinventing the wheel. ?

  11. theguyuk :
    It is a shame all H3 board makers don’t financially and technically support Armbian, surely a one stop software with support, instantly make their boards useful and saleable. Instead of all reinventing the wheel. ?

    thats usual china business – copy, sell and forget.

  12. TC :

    theguyuk :
    It is a shame all H3 board makers don’t financially and technically support Armbian, surely a one stop software with support, instantly make their boards useful and saleable. Instead of all reinventing the wheel. ?

    thats usual china business – copy, sell and forget.

    @theguyuk @TC

    We do get support, it wouldn’t be fair to deny. Free boards, access to their technical gurus (in some cases), but no regular cash. Technical gurus “help” in some cases looks like “please teach us”. Yet another blow. Actually we got some “thanks cash”, counting from the beginning of the project (2.5 years), twice from Xunlung and once (end user level) from Sinovoip.

  13. Would be nice to skip the Ethernet jack, use micro A/B USB plugs. camera connector, and the standard 40 pin connector. What is nice for the H3, it has several serial ports on the connector. Use the thermal design to dissipate heat instead of throttling the H3.

  14. That’s a shame they did not add a mini HDMI port, it would have been the smallest Openelec device with HEVC / 4K capability

  15. @cnxsoft
    Same voltage regulator used like on OPi One/Lite and NanoPi M1 (switching between 1.1V and 1.3V) so will be interesting how low minimum consumption can be adjusted. H3 can enter deep sleep without a PMIC since it contains an own AR100 OpenRISC core that handles this (at least with legacy kernel), if deep sleep is entered then consumption drops below 0.3W. Resume takes milliseconds. No idea which wake-up sources are available on this board (I doubt it’s network)

    Mainline kernel patches are more or less ready (but not all sent/accepted upstream) and since we now also have Ethernet and THS/throttling stuff ready with 4.6/4.7 it shouldn’t take that long until first Armbian images with vanilla kernel can be released (as Igor already said: It’s not a technical problem but users lacking reading skills why we don’t provide images now)

    Some more thoughts/info on this device at the usual location: http://forum.armbian.com/index.php/topic/1580-nanopi-neo/?view=getlastpost

  16. We made some progress in handling the overheat issue on the NanoPi NEO compared to the NanoPi M1

  17. @Sébastien
    OpenELEC might benefit from HDMI or CVBS available (not true for the NEO 😉 ). IMO it’s quite obvious that we’re talking about a headless device here.

    @FATechsupport
    I wonder whether you already thought about selling the board with populated GPIO headers (large please — 20mm at least!). Potential use cases (using the yet not defined ‘NANO HAT’ standard also 40x40mm in size) that immediately came to my mind:

    – NAS HAT: two JMS567 or JMS568 USB-to-SATA bridges (stackable please)
    – Netboot HAT: 8 Mbit SPI NOR flash to boot from and a passive PoE splitter + step-down converter to power/boot the NanoPi NEO through network (stackable please)
    – I²C to 1-Wire bridge, eg. using DS2482 (stackable please)
    – RFID HAT: SPI RFID reader (not stackable please)

  18. @tkaiser
    How are the USB ports implemented on this? Do they share bandwidth? The headers can have 2 USB ports too, there can be 4 USB 2.0 ports on this?

  19. To some EU countries the shipping is $5 to another (also in EU) it is $10 !!
    $10 is really too much for China Post shipping.

  20. tkaiser :
    IMO it’s quite obvious that we’re talking about a headless device here.

    I don’t understand that kind of self inflicted limitation.

    Unless adding hdmi output on the H3 requires a lot more (more power stuff probably) than adding a simple micro hdmi connector, it feels out of place for me to use such a powerful, full featured soc, and discard the basic output that any “non advanced” user would be expecting. Maybe they are really struggling to get the prices down.

    On another subject since you seem to know a lot about the H3 power management, i was wondering if it’s possible to run that soc from 3.3V, like you can with an rpi, and if it should work on any board (does not work on my opi pc) and/or if you need to set the H3 in a particular configuration to do that ?

    @Sébastien
    you can forget about openelec (kodi linux) on the H3 for the moment, there’s not much support for it, extremely small number of users (only jernej ?) putting out some code/images and from what i understood it requires a custom kodi version, partial codecs support and so on..

    As an end user, it’s very far from what you can get on the Amlogic socs, too bad we don’t get as many S805/905/905x boards, i can’t really understand that btw..

  21. NanoPi NEO is for light-weight IoT project, it has only single bank RAM chip. As all know, running a GUI Desktop will cause the SoC so hot. But running the Ubuntu Core can be in a good hot level. and almost NAS machine has no display output, the SSH and serial is a popular and good way to login.

    With the single bank RAM, it’s not suitable to run Kodi.

    We have made a lot of accessories – the Matrix series. please visit http://wiki.friendlyarm.com/ to find more.

    We not only make a board, but also we provide more support, we update the wiki and software all the time. it is different from others.

    and the shipping cost is $5.

  22. Tiny linux machine with ethernet or wired network is what I want and ordered one
    for my ‘lisp machine in the pocket’. What I hope is stable linux support and some gpio.

  23. JotaMG :
    That should be the UK, I guess

    lol, never a wrong moment to bash on #brexit 😀

    to Germany, i got 5$ for 1pc, 7$ for 2 and 13$ for 3pc – with DHL only 1$ more a no brainer then

  24. @Mindee
    Is there going to be a 3D printed case available for the NEO soon? I can see that heatsinking for the CPU might be an issue in an enclosed box (mount the PCB processor side up, with ventilation slots??).

  25. @mdel
    Hmm… by looking at the PCB it’s quite obvious that adding (Micro) HDMI with ESD protection would need larger PCB dimensions or other stuff removed. And since there exist several cheap H3 devices with HDMI already I really see no need for display output here. Interconnectivity is still great since SSH and serial console exist and with the current legacy kernel FriendlyARM and Armbian use the Micro USB port can not only be used for powering the board but act like an additional serial console or network interface too (g_serial, g_ether, g_multi modules)

    Regarding ‘H3 power management’: There is no such thing, H3 has been designed without PMIC support so it’s all about the voltage regulators used on the board and schematics. On Orange Pis it’s save to provide between 4.5V and 5.5V for the core components but since VCC is fed directly to USB/HDMI this will already violate specs here. You have to check schematics and look up input range of the components used.

    @PuceBaboon
    Small ventilation slots do not work (eye candy for clueless people). Would be interesting if FriendlyARM provides a 3D printed enclosure that can be combined with a 40x40mm heatsink as ‘top cover’ (board mounted upside down). All that’s missing then are 4 screws and a silicone heat pad between H3 and heatsink (one use case we discussed with a customer: Encryption dongle appearing as Ethernet USB adapter and powered through Micro USB)

  26. @PuceBaboon
    Sorry, wasn’t meant as an insult. But so many SBC vendors provide enclosures with ‘ventilation’ slots/holes and if they test whether this is effective or not the simple result is: not at all unless they’re really large (same with heatsinks — if distance between the fins isn’t large enough convection won’t work and the heatsink needs an additional fan to be more effective).

    So vendors (enclosure makers) are either clueless themselves or know that nice looking slots/holes don’t help with heat dissipation and therefore design this stuff for a clueless target audience (hope it’s more clear now).

  27. tkaiser :
    @mdel
    with the current legacy kernel FriendlyARM and Armbian use the Micro USB port can not only be used for powering the board but act like an additional serial console or network interface too (g_serial, g_ether, g_multi modules)

    I’m interested in this. Do you have a tutorial somewhere how it works to use the micro-usb as a network interface? Is it just wiring a RJ45 connector to a micro-usb plug and tell the kernel to use the micro-usb as a network port.
    Are there other dev boards that can do that also? Cubie? Odroid?

  28. @Roel
    I think he’s talking about USB gadget Ethernet driver, so you can access to Ethernet via USB, no need to have a Ethernet to USB dongle. It’s mostly interesting for configuration. BeagleBone Green Wireless is configured that way: http://www.cnx-software.com/2016/05/21/getting-started-with-beaglebone-green-wireless-development-board/

    You just use a normally micro USB to USB cable between your PC and the board. That’s a software thing, so any board can be configured that way. I don’t know the details, but searching for “linux USB Ethernet gadget” should provide enough info.

  29. @Roel
    As Jean-Luc already said this is just the Ethernet gadget driver. In Armbian we define the OTG port by default as host port (I added Nano Pi NEO the day before yesterday and the necessary patch to sun8i kernel sources a while ago) so all you need is a Micro USB to type A cable to connect to a host and a simple entry in /etc/network/interfaces that brings up the interface and changes the port role from host to OTG — see starting from post #3: http://forum.armbian.com/index.php/topic/1417-testers-wanted-g-ether-driver-h3-device-as-ethernet-dongle/

    To the host the H3 device appears as an USB-Ethernet dongle (easy to use with OS X and Linux, PITA with Windows according to others) and performance with legacy kernel is ~120 MBit/s therefore such a H3 device used in this mode can perfectly act as an independent encryption device — simply have a look at the thread above where some use cases and some caveats (topology for example) are described.

  30. Hopefully they get the CE Mark before they become useless at all (in case of performance and concurency).
    Importing within EU is not possible a legal way i think, no CE no EU 😉 and as european citizen you can expect that tax officers wouldn’t let pass your order … i don’t know if FriendlyARM refunds payed money if the order is on hold at european Taxoffices? 😉 I like that board so much, but without CE Mark i can’t buy them. I don’t have to burn money at all…

  31. @tkaiser
    okay i must have misunderstood your power management comments.
    But is it possible to put the H3 in sleep mode directly in armbian or do you need some external control ?
    Then how can it be woken up ? If you’ve discussed this somewhere, i’d be interested to read it.

    Anyways that “huge” ethernet connector still feels out of place if the goal was to make the tiniest form factor.
    And if it was meant to build clusters (or arrays of servers), a 100Mbps link will not help much, then again if the board stays connected to a cable and sits somewhere forever why should i ever care if it is 2cm larger or not..

    To me, small standalone devices only rhyme with portability (not necessarily with wireless) so i don’t need to have an ethernet port, a micro usb will do just fine.

    In my opinion the raspberry pi zero did almost everything right (besides having an outdated soc) and if you’re good at copying other people’s ideas then at least don’t ignore the best ones.

  32. @Chris
    Don’t worry about this. Conformité Européenne marking is not required unless you want to distribute this thing on EU market.

  33. @mdel
    H3 can be put to sleep either using GUI (tested it with our Xenial and Jessie builds) or through sysfs: check ‘cat /sys/power/state’ (IIRC it’s this node). In this state CPU cores will be shut down, DRAM will be clocked just with 48MHz and the AR100 OpenRISC core present in H3 takes over (that’s the so called ‘ARISC’ stuff also responsible for throttling).

    Waking up has to be configured first (eg. power button or IR receiver activity) and then simply a resume happens. This does only work with legacy kernel (no support for ARISC in mainline kernel so far) and since H3 is a SoC not made for mobile use but OTT boxes instead the main use case is to ‘power off’ such a box (limiting consumption then to 0.3W) and power on immediately (in reality simply a resume from deep sleep).

    I haven’t tested whether disabling eg. HDMI helps with reducing consumption but in my tests so far idle consumption of any Orange Pi could be lowered to 1.5W (300mA) easily. Maybe 200mA are also possible without entering sleep states (drastically downclocking DRAM and CPU cores or even disabling them already at low temperatures). Might be worth a try and is pretty easy with legacy kernel since all that’s necessary can be adjusted in a few sections in the so called fex files. But H3 devices using the flexible SY8106A voltage generator (Orange Pi PC or above) have an advantage here since they can also be undervolted unlike NanoPi M1/NEO or OPi One/Lite (or BPi M2+ which has the worst design not being able to adjust VDD_CPUX at all)

  34. @mdel
    I did a quick test with Orange Pi Lite (since I have no NanoPi here). When configured to be as slow as an RPi Zero this H3 device idles at 160mA and full CPU utilization means 220mA. Simply check Armbian H3 forum for configuration and results.

  35. @PuceBaboon
    Printed Cases
    To answer my own question …I just heard directly back from FriendlyARM and a case for the NEO is in the works. My contact estimated that it would be available on the site in another couple of weeks or so.

  36. @Set
    No, I think you are completly wrong. Do you have any serious URL for that? My information is that Customs can stop your order completly when its not marked or proved that it is save in case of savety and electromagnetics.

  37. BTW: I played a bit around with comparable H3 devices (since I have no NEO) and by configuring H3 to be as slow and featureless as an RPi Zero idle consumption gets close to or even below 100mA. Limiting DRAM clockspeed is important (switching from 672 MHz down to 264 MHz reduces consumption by 40mA while still being as fast as the slow DDR2 implementation of the RPi, same applies to disabling display, same for USB ports) and the good news is: Simply by configuring H3 correctly idle consumption can be dropped below 100mA while the device’s performance can instantly explode when needed.

    RPi 2/3 performance at Zero’s costs and possible to adjust performance vs. consumption as needed. If FriendlyARM ships developer samples I would start to implement that as part of Armbian (IoT OS images or more likely including the necessary kernel patch into our normal builds and providing a configuration tool to adjust settings — since nearly all of this is perfectly accessible from user space)

  38. @cnxsoft
    I already referenced Jeff’s measurements in Armbian forums and I doubt that my equipment is precise enough (so mostly assumptions backed by tests feeding 3 OPi PC in parallel and checking consumption then). But the focus of my tests was to get the idea where to fiddle around to lower the common 300mA H3 board idle consumption.

    When I looked at FriendlyARM’s settings for the NEO I scratched my head why they chose such a low DRAM clockspeed of just 432 MHz. And that was the begin of the journey since I thought ‘maybe they try to limit consumption?’ — and it’s like that! And since H3’s memory controller combined with dual bank DDR3 is magnitudes faster than any RPi (limited to DDR2 anyway) we can downclock DRAM to 264 MHz while still being as fast as an RPi. We can even further DRAM clockspeed and return to fast memory anytime from user space (or even triggered by cpufreq scaling kernel code automagically).

    I hope some of our Armbian users are joining these efforts and do some more testing with more precise equipment. For me it’s already a success being able to let an OPi PC (or PC Plus) idle at 200-210mA while having Ethernet and all 4 USB ports active and being able to instantly increase performance by 6 times when needed. But it seems more and more people start to use H3 devices as Arduino replacements and for them it’s important to know how to deactivate what to get lowest idle consumption possible and also how to limit maximum consumption (also pretty easy with H3 — at least with Armbian)

    But isn’t it funny? Half a year ago H3 boards were ill-reputed for overheating insanely, consuming way too much and not being useable at all due to lack of software/support. And in the meantime we realized that’s all just (horribly wrong) settings, in the meantime every new H3 device has superiour software support within a few days due to community efforts and we’re able to use these little beasts even as low power controllers now 🙂

  39. Frank :
    @mdel
    Scaleway on ARM: http://pastebin.com/raw/V2AY57J1

    That’s Marvell Armada XP (MV78460). Great SoC with plenty of SERDES lanes and pretty much overkill for boring web hosting especially given that Scaleway storage seems to be virtualized. But both network and storage paths seem to be implemented as PCB traces and interconnection done using Marvell’s PHY transceivers and switch ICs I would suppose. Indeed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFhgSKNJP2s (higher rack density, less cabling)

    I wonder when/if someone starts to use el cheapo SoCs like eg. H3 for something like this. H3 SOM combined with 2GB RAM and local eMMC storage connected to a baseboard that interconnects a bunch of SOMs with a switch IC and provides a few uplinks to the TOR switches.

  40. @Frank
    thx i rented a couple of those last year but couldn’t remember the cpu and didn’t really find any use for them either although they could handle quite a lot of things as you mentioned. I ended up using mine as picture servers to offload some larger dedicated servers.

    @cnxsoft
    those usb power meters are usually pretty inaccurate, especially in the low milliamps range but i’m not sure there’s a much better solution unless you go for a real (cheap) multimeter.

    You could use a dedicated power supply, those modules are pretty cheap and quite accurate when you chose a good one, something like :
    http://www.banggood.com/DP30V5A-L-32V-5A-36W-DC-Adjustable-Step-Down-Constant-Voltage-Power-Supply-Voltmeter-Ammeter-p-1061372.html

    I don’t own that one in particular but you can get something similar that you know has accurate readings.

    You could also use a small 3$ volt/amp meter module but you’ll have to introduce it in your dc power rail (cutting usb wires), some are quite accurate if you calibrate them properly (screwdriver), so it’s probably easier to use a power supply as linked above.

    Please note those supplies don’t usually show power draw, only volt/amps, although i did find some that did watts as well.

    @tkaiser
    to the best of my knowledge scaleway developed their arm soc based server boards and they need engineering support from the soc manufacturer, so unless alwinner can provide that kind of service it’s very unlikely a large company will decide to invest in a new “toy”.
    Online is a kind of company that gets custom motherboards from intel for their mid / high server range so it was quite a first for them to do that work (almost) in house with that new arm infrastructure.

    And seeing the price they rent that kind of hardware you can imagine there’s no real need to go cheaper with their arm cpu choices.

  41. @mdel
    If you look at the picture of the 512MB NEO variant with USB/Ethernet unpopulated (wiki link) then IMO it’s just a matter of time until someone starts to design a backplane with an Ethernet switch IC where the boards can be plugged in (with GPIO, one USB and Ethernet connected through pins).

    One rack unit is 1¾ inch so the NEO fits operated vertically, could do emergency booting through SPI flash or USB FEL boot in case SD card installation got corrupted and one might be able to cramp in more than 400 NEOs in 1RU.

    I personally find this concept somewhat weird but many people seem to love the idea to host their web services ‘on their own’ since they don’t trust in virtualization and so on (see all the weird Raspberry Pi hosting services). So maybe we see hosters appearing offering H3 hosting for less than $1 per month where you simply send in the SD card with your full installation.

  42. Some interesting comments comparing the NEO to the Pi Zero… I too am reviewing the NEO and up to now have concerns – so it runs Ubuntu – and that’s fine if you want Ubuntu but they claim “an open source tiny pi” – well Pi runs Debian and I’m not having any luck with this – I cannot find an official Debian for the NEO and my attempts to get the Armbian version running have been lacking – it installs but WinSCP does not want to work with it.

    Secondly heat – the Raspberry Pi zero does not heat up enough to cook eggs – in common with many H3 boards, the Neo is running like an oven (I have two of them and they’re both the same so it is not a duff board). Many normal USB mains power supplies won’t even start it up as it needs 2 amps.

    So when I see this running a little cooler – and running Debian with some kind of Pi compatibility – then I think it will deserve it’s name – right now that’s not what I’m seeing.

    Early days – but not a good start… (clearly Armian DOES work as others have managed to get it working – I wonder if they are using WinSCP (latest version and the one before that) – I use this for everything – it always works but it is not having this board and Armbian up to now.

  43. @Peter Scargill
    Seems like the login issue is already resolved (Putty vs. WinSCP)?

    Regarding heat and consumption I currently do a lot of research. I wonder whether the single bank DRAM configuration combined with DDR3 DRAM makes the difference (Olimex reported the same when they started with their H3 prototypes and they also used just a single DDR3 chip). The H3 based Orange Pis using dual bank configuration and either DDR3 or DDR3L do not heat up that much. Also it seems some components on the board are not chosen wisely (eg. a LDO regulator on the NEO where Orange Pi One/Lite use a buck converter that does not heat up like hell).

    Anyway: The NEO is clearly not made for heavy stuff so we chose to stay at 912 MHz CPU clockspeed max in Armbian now (active in newest test images from yesterday). In case you really want to compare the NEO with RPi Zero then you would’ve to make it as featureless: H3 has 4 Ethernet ports and real Ethernet (all of this available on the NEO!), any RPi has just one single USB OTG port. Switch everything off on H3 and you get comparable results (look at Armbian forums, Free section, ‘SBC consumption/performance comparisons’ thread for some numbers). Though no H3 board can match idle consumption of an RPi Zero but as soon as we’re talking about ‘wired IoT’ node no RPi can compete with Orange Pi One/Lite or even PC/PC Plus (NEO has unfortunately way higher idle consumption)

    BTW: It would be great if you could outline in Armbian forum what’s necessary to get your favourite IoT setup up and running (Node-Red, SQlite, Mosquitto and so on). We’re currently re-designing Armbian’s package management heavily and move stuff from image creation to sanely built Debian packages that can be installed later. Knowing what’s necessary to become a ‘first class citizen’ in IoT world would be nice. And since we already support +40 SBC there are a lot of platforms which could benefit from. Let’s work together on this 🙂

  44. Hi there tkaiser. The original Orange Pi I had used to run hot enough to fry eggs – I guess things must have improved. I’m not actually comparing it to Pi zero myself – I think it’s a really cute size board and ideal for a little home control server if it will work – anyway, up to now I have Armbian working after that little hickup -and am trying to install my script for Node-Red/SQLite/Mosquitto etc… time will tell. Got a bit confused about Armbian asking about screen resolution when it does not seem to have a graphical interface running (tightvncserver failed miserably). I agree completely with your last paragraph – why not get in touch – I’m pete at scargill dot org – and I’ll point you to what I’m doing – I have lots of followers on the blog using my home control and setting up on anything other than a Pi is usually hit and miss. I would love to see these items which I think of as standard all set up – let’s do this. I’ll look forward to hearing from you.

  45. Mainline kernel images for NEO updated to 4.7.2 with new ‘schedutil’ cpufreq governor and experimental USB OTG support: http://forum.armbian.com/index.php/topic/1580-nanopi-neo/page-6

    While throttling works fine and prevents overheating (torturing tiny NEO with cpuburn-a7 since a while) it’s less efficient compared to our legacy kernel settings (slightly less performance when throttling happens and probably more stress for the voltage regulator). Will let cpuburn-a7 run for a few days to see whether the board survives or not 🙂

  46. I got one of these babies. The question is how do I even ? Do I need the serial board as well to connect to it ?
    I will use it headless, so no hdmi output is ok, but I need to do initial setup for my network obviously.

  47. @coze
    Almost forgot: In case you’ve NEO PCB rev 1.1 then it should be save to allow the H3 SoC to clock up to 1200 MHz:

    followed by a reboot should do the job. There were stability/deadlock and thermal issues with NEO PCB rev. 1.0 so we chose to limit maximum cpufreq to 912 MHz by default.

  48. @tcmichals
    According to users Air doesn’t suffer from this issue. There’s a lengthy thread with details in Armbian H3 forum but none of the Armbian devs had physical access to NanoPi Air so far. So it’s a bit surprising that both our new OpenSource sunxi flashing tool (to directly flash OS images to eMMC) and the Air OS image seem to work perfectly.

    Further references:

    http://forum.armbian.com/index.php/topic/1580-nanopi-neo-air/?p=18277
    http://image.armbian.com/betaimages/

  49. @theguyuk
    ‘Duo’ since it’s the combination of Lichee Pi Zero (idea, form) and Orange Pi Zero (ingredients: H2+ and famous XR819 Wi-Fi)? 😉

    Just kidding, together with the ‘Mini Shield’ this is a very interesting concept…

  50. FriendlyELEC ZeroPi coming with same dimensions and similar specs as NanoPi NEO, except that Fast Ethernet is replaced by Gigabit Ethernet. No photos yet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement