802.11ah WiFi HaLow development board launched for $99 (Crowdfunding)

When 802.11.ah WiFi operating in the 900 MHz frequency range for low-power long-range communication was announced in 2014, then named WiFi HaLow in 2016, I naively assumed it would soon compete against other LPWAN standards like LoRaWAN or Sigfox.

However, over the next few years, we did not see much interest in the wireless standard. But it may be picking up now, as Gateworks recently announced a Newracom NRC7292 based 802.11ah WiFi HaLow Mini PCIe module for their Arm Linux SBC’s, and a company called TELEDATICS has now introduced the Halo TD-XPAH 802.11ah Hallow development board featuring an AzureWave AW-HM482 module.

Halo TD-XPAH board specifications:

  • 802.11ah WiFi HaLow connectivity
    • AzureWave AW-HM482 module based on Newracom NRC7292 Cortex-M3/M0 SoC with 752KB RAM, 2MB flash
    • Compliant with IEEE 802.11ah WiFi HaLow operating in 902.0 ~ 928.0 MHz range
    • Up to 15 Mbps data rate
    • Up to at least 1km range, but can be extended further
    • Client and Access point (up to 370+ clients) modes
  • USB – 1x USB Type-C port for power & communications
  • Expansion – 3x headers with up to 4x I2C, 2x SPI, 4x UART, 8x PWM, 4x 9-bit ADC, 32x GPIO
  • Timer – 6x high precision timers, 3x watchdog timers
  • Debugging – 10-pin JTAG Arm interface
  • Misc – RTC, temperature sensor

The board can be used as a standalone device, or as a USB device. The company provides both the firmware/SDK (nrc7292_sdk) and Linux drivers (nrc7292_sw_pkg) on Github, as well as a KiCAD 6.x template to create your own expansion board.

Camera kit with Halo TD-XPAH board, antenna, and Arducam camera

While WiFi HaLow is another LPWAN standard, the higher bitrate enables different applications than LoRaWAN, albeit at the cost of range, battery life, and actual costs. The potential use cases include long-distance wireless camera systems, distributed air quality sensor systems, remote solar field monitor networks, long-range airborne drone links, wide area soil moisture & plant health reporting networks, RS485 wireless communications drop-in replacement for copper wiring, emergency communications platform, and more.

Comparison table provided by TELEDATICS – WiFi HaLow (802.11ah) vs LoRa vs NB-IoT vs standard WiFi, etc…

HaLo TD-XPAH WiFi HaLow development board and hAT expansion boards have just launched on Crowd Supply. The development board itself goes for $99, fur the company also offers a $29 air quality sensor hAT (temperature, humidity, air quality), a $49 WiFi gateway hAT with a 2.4 GHz 802.11n radio, and an Ethernet hAT also for $49. Shipping is free to the US but adds $8 to the rest of the world. Delivery of the hAT expansion boards is expected to start by mid-May, while the development board should be ready around three weeks later (first week of June 2022). That’s indeed significantly more expensive than LoRa and NB-IoT hardware, but at least there’s no need for a relatively expensive gateway since the board can act as one, and the higher bitrate may make it suitable where other competing LPWAN standards are not.

[Update: Initially published on December 20, 2021, the post was updated on March 2022 with the launch of the Crowd Supply campaign]

Share this:

Support CNX Software! Donate via PayPal or cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or buy review samples

9 Replies to “802.11ah WiFi HaLow development board launched for $99 (Crowdfunding)”

  1. Important to note that this board is only suitable for regions which allow the use of the 902-928 MHz band like the US (not usable in Europe and many other countries). Don’t know if they have other versions for those countries/regions.

    Also 1km is in theory the outdoor, LOS range with a 1 MHz channel at 200 mW at MCS 10 (see https://www.riverpublishers.com/journal/journal_articles/RP_Journal_2245-800X_115.pdf), which yields a maximum of 170 kbps. To reach 15 Mbps you need to reduce range dramatically (it will depend on which combination of bandwidth, number of streams, and MCS the chip allows, but significantly less in any case). And of course in regions where power is more limited (like the ETSI region) range will be reduced.

    Can it do 1km? Probably. Can it do 15Mbps? Probably as well. Can it do both at the same time? Extremely unlikely.

    I would be curious to see the power draw of the board in TX and RX.

      1. Even though it lacks precise figures, this confirms it: they only manage to “ping” at the longer distances (1km to 1.5km), while video only works up to 600-700m. They don’t specify the bitrate, but insist that video quality isn’t important, so it’s probably quite low, very far from 15 Mbps, probably closer to a few hundred kbps. Still a pretty interesting result for some use cases of course.

  2. The price will need to come down by about an order of magnitude (to around $10) to compete with LORA esp32 boards (which even have an onboard display). But since they are replicating function without a clear advantage, I don’t really see that happening. If access points supported HaLow it would be a different story, but as is this is just another good idea that took too long to come to market.

    1. I think HaLow has a totally different use case than LoRaWAN. HaLow enables direct TCP/IP communication at a medium distance. While LoRaWAN has a bigger range it only allows for 27 kbps.

      1. LoRaWAN is structured for sensors that periodically upload data. It’s not very good for devices that might need to act on upstream commands at any time with low latency,

  3. Single channel LoRawan gateways can be deployed using cheap esp32 boards. You dont even need to participate in LoRaWan at all for private deployment, just use straight up lora.

    Either way this is very different to LoRa, 10x the transmit power as LoRa, lower range, higher bitrate. There are already expensive wifi long range solutions. So it seems this fills a small niche for lower price than those, maybe camera at end of driveway stuff once you figure out power.

  4. $99 will give me just one board. So to have something I can work with, I have to buy at least two boards. That’s a bit expensive. I mean developers who test these boards will promote them and do them a favor. So I think the should subsidies them and make them cheaper like $30 per board.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Advertisement
Advertisement