Beelink BT4 Mini PC Review – Slow, Buggy, Fan-cooled, and Overheating

Beelink T4 ReviewIntel’s low-cost chip shortage has been so bad that Beelink has had to demothball some Atom chips when creating their new mini PC the Beelink BT4. This is one of the cheapest new mini PCs recently launched and uses the somewhat now old Cherry Trail Intel Atom x5-Z8500 CPU which was launched at the start of 2015 and is a quad-core 4-thread 1.44 GHz processor boosting to 2.24 GHz with Intel’s HD Graphics.

The BT4 is the same form factor as the more recent Beelink mini PCs being a half-thick ‘NUC’ style device physically consisting of a 120 x 120 x 22 mm (4.72 x 4.72 x 0.87 inches) plastic rectangular case. This is not a passive device as it contains a small fan that stays on after the device has been shut down. The front panel has only a blue ‘power’ LED and the rear panel includes the power button, power jack, VGA port, HDMI port, a gigabit Ethernet port, and a headphone jack. On the left side there are a couple of 3.0 USBs and on the right side are a couple more 3.0 USB ports and a micro-SD slot. The full specifications include:

BT4 Specifications

The BT4 comes with 64GB eMMC with pre-installed Windows 10 Home (version 1903 OS build 18362.418) together with 4GB of soldered DDR3 RAM.

In the box you get a mounting bracket with screws for attaching the device to behind a monitor together with a couple of HDMI cables, a power adapter, a manual, a service card and a ‘satisfaction’ card:

Beelink BT4 Power Supply Components
Click to Enlarge

Starting with a quick look at the hardware information shows it is aligned to the specification:

BT4 disk management

BT4 windows system
Click to Enlarge

HWInfo64I first tried to update Windows but it wasn’t a smooth process with the system sometimes freezing, Windows updates crashing or just random reboots. Eventually, I managed to update Windows to version 1909 OS build 18363.535 so I then installed my standard set of benchmarking tools to look at performance under Windows. After running CrystalDiskMark:


BT4 crystaldiskmark

I ran 3D Mark’s Ice Storm:

BT4 3dmark ice storm
Click to Enlarge

which yielded a very low score. So I ran ‘HWINFO’ to look at the internal temperatures:

temperatures after ice storm

which although high didn’t include any indication of thermal throttling. So I carried on and ran 3D Mark’s Cloud Gate:

bt4 3dmark cloud gate
Click to Enlarge

which resulted in another unusually low score but again with no signs of thermal throttling:


Meanwhile, the external temperature of the device was sitting at around 53°C with a room temperature of just over 28°C. Interestingly the cheap plastic feel to the case actually makes it feel less warm when compared to a metal cased device like the T45 at the same external temperature and whilst you might think the fan would be working its hardest because of the temperature it is surprisingly quiet. Pushing my luck I tried to run 3D Mark’s Sky Diver but the screen froze with the following error:

sky diver crash

A quick reboot and running Sky Diver gave the same error. Decidedly unimpressed at this point with the benchmark results so far I then uninstalled the untested ones and installed Chrome instead. Running Octane 2.0 gave consistent results with a representative average of:

windows octane 2.0
Click to Enlarge

and which, unsurprisingly by now, was much lower than expected.

Given the price of the BT4 and because it had two output port types it seems likely that the device would appeal more as an HTPC than as a workstation so I decided to focus more on reviewing its video playback capabilities.

For this ‘real-world’ testing, I played videos in Edge and Kodi in Windows. Normally I start by testing 4K playback quality but neither this option nor 1440p were available in Edge:

edge missing 4k option

yet they were available in Chrome:

chrome 4k option
Click to Enlarge

There’s a good reason why they should be omitted from Chrome as the results table further below will show and the video playback performance in general under Chrome is not very good.

Keeping an eye on the internal temperatures one thing I did notice was that after playing a couple of videos thermal throttling occurred:

Beelink BT4 thermal throttling

Feeling on a roll now as despite the throttling Windows had been stable without any freezes or reboots so I tried to run the remaining benchmarks I still had installed, namely Passmark:

bt4 passmark
Click to Enlarge

followed by Novabench:

beelink bt4 novabench

One point I had noticed earlier was that in the configuration the power limit was set at one second:

power limit one second
Click to Enlarge

and that there was no performance power plan available:

windows 10 power plan
Click to Enlarge

so the device was running at its upper limits in terms of power and temperature tolerances.

Next, I shrunk the Windows partition and created a new 15GB partition so I could install and dual boot Ubuntu using an Ubuntu 18.04.3 ISO:

windows ubuntu partition

However, on booting the liveUSB I immediately ran into the system freezing. I remembered that this was a common issue with Ubuntu on Cherry Trail devices so I respun the Ubuntu 18.04.3 ISO using my ‘’ script with a ‘-g’ option of ‘intel_idle.max_cstate=1’. Fortunately, I could now boot and install Ubuntu and after updates, a brief check showed that everything was working including WiFi, Bluetooth, Ethernet, and HDMI audio although headphone audio had a slight problem in that the right speaker was quieter than the left. Checking the connection and I noticed that the jack doesn’t want to fully insert so this could be the reason. I then ran some basic commands to look at the hardware in more detail:

At this point, the BT4 suffered a random reboot so rather than struggle to run more benchmarks that would really only highlight the now poor performance of this CPU I went straight to the ‘real-world’ testing of playing videos in Firefox, Chrome, and Kodi in Ubuntu.

The results were similar to Windows in that the BT4 is only good at playing [email protected] and H264 encoded videos. The following tables summarise the tests and results for each of web browsing, Kodi in general and Kodi playing specific videos:

Click to Enlarge

23-browser-tests 24-kodi-general

An interesting phenomenon was seen whilst playing an HEVC in Windows in that it played in slow motion resulting in the elapsed time exceeding the length in time of the video:

kodi hevc plays in slow motion

As previously mentioned the BT4 includes a fan and the reason why it is whisper quiet in operation is because it is tiny and useless as we will see later:

Beelink BT4 fan
Click to Enlarge

It sits on top of a relatively small heatsink:

BT4 heatsink

that covers about half of the entire board:

Beelink BT4 motherboard
Click to Enlarge

The device does get hot. During usage the maximum temperature I recorded on the top of the device was 55.9°C:

Beelink BT4 external temperature

noting that the ambient room temperature was 31.4°C as it was a hot day with the outside temperature reaching 44°C (111°F):

austrialia outside temperature

At the same time, the noise level was quiet and recorded at 36.5 dBA.

However, it is questionable as to whether the cooling solution really works. Under Windows I played a video in Edge followed by the same video in Kodi both for about six minutes:

windows edge fan effectiveness
Click to Enlarge
Click to Enlarge

Thermal throttling was observed and after about five minutes the temperatures dropped to around 65°C/72°C which seems to be the idling temperature under Windows:

Beelink BT4 Review windows fan cooling
Click to Enlarge

Under Ubuntu, I ran an H.264 video in Kodi for 20 minutes and the internal temperature whilst it climbed almost immediately remained consistently in the low eighties reaching a peak of 85°C:

ubuntu kodi fan effectiveness
Click to Enlarge

(note the 4 skipped frames occurred when opening and setting up the monitoring programs)

It took nearly the same amount of time (around 20 minutes) to cool down to Ubuntu’s idling temperature of the low sixties:

ubuntu fan cooling downOnce cooled down I ran Octane 2.0 in Ubuntu:

Beelink BT4 ubuntu octane
Click to Enlarge

as I was now starting to understand this device. In fact, earlier I had also re-run some Windows benchmarks having allowed the CPU to cool down to its idle temperature and the results showed a marked improvement to the first time I ran them:

38-ice-storm-cooling-down 39-cloud-gate-cooling-down

Click to Enlarge

However, this only serves to highlight the impact of the poor cooling solution to the overall performance capability.

The astute reader may well ask at this point whether I tried to rerun 3D Mark’s Sky Diver. Well, a couple of days later I did just that after spending about an hour trying to boot Windows as it kept freezing immediately after logging in. I recorded the initial temperature before the test:

initial temperature

and the temperature immediately after 3D Mark crashed with the same error message as before:


So despite it being a cooler day with the room temperature only 25.6°C (yes that is relative compared to the other day when testing) thermal throttling was still occurring.

It is because of these high CPU temperatures and the (likely resultant) instability of Windows that I would carefully consider these issues before purchasing this device.

I’d like to thank Beelink for providing the BT4 for review. It currently retails at around $120 from the various Chinese mini PC resellers.

Share this:

Support CNX Software! Donate via PayPal or cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or buy review samples

Notify of
1 year ago

I don’t understand why anyone would want an Atom CPU with a fan. It just doesn’t make sense. My Asus hybrid tablet has exactly the same CPU and works perfectly fine as a fanless device.

I have another Chinese cheap mini PC (Z83) with a Z8350 CPU. It struggles to play video under Windows and Linux. Funny, it works great with LibreElec distro.

1 year ago

The lacking of HDR is a pity for usino z8350 as a kodi Player:-(

1 year ago

What you found is that most browsers don’t use gpu hardware acceleration or only do older stuff like h.264. Not the vp9 youtube uses. You can install ‘h264ify’ on chrome and chromium based browsers, which will force youtube to send h.264 instead of vp9. You’ll still probably have to tell chrome in Flags to turn on even the h264 gpu decoding. Googles take “Its too expensive to support gpu hardware acceleration”. Apparently having billions in your pocket still isn’t enough. To see if gpu HW accel is happening in windows, open the task manager, click the performance tab and then… Read more »

1 year ago

How on earth did they get an Atom system to overheat? LOL

And yeah, even if it didn’t overheat, that cpu is a dog. I have a machine with roughly twice the cpu power and its annoyingly slow at just about everything.

1 year ago

Why is low-cost chip shortage? Supply or demand?

1 year ago

Basically it is a lack of supply. Intel prioritised the production of Xeon and Core processors to meet the high-performance market demand which in turn created a shortage in the entry-level market. See and for actual details.