Linux and Memory Performance on an Intel NUC 11 Enthusiast Phantom Canyon NUC11PHKi7C

nuc11phki7c Linux

I’ve already looked at Windows performance on the NUC11PHKi7C Enthusiast Phantom Canyon which is Intel’s latest NUC 11 flagship product specifically targeting gamers as it includes an NVIDIA RTX 2060 GPU. Now it is the turn of Linux and like before I will compare performance against Intel’s previous NUC with a discrete GPU: the NUC 9 Extreme Ghost Canyon. I will also briefly revisit Windows performance by looking at the impact of using 3200MHz memory as opposed to the 2400MHz used during the previous review.

Hardware Overview

As a reminder, the NUC11PHKi7C physically consists of a 221 x 142 x 42 mm (8.70 x 5.59 x 1.65 inches) rectangular plastic case. It is an actively cooled mini PC and uses Intel’s 10 nm Core i7-1165G7 Tiger Lake processor which is a quad-core 8-thread 2.80 GHz processor boosting to 4.70 GHz with Intel’s Iris Xe Graphics and the NUC also includes an NVIDIA N18E-G1-B notebook graphics card which is a GeForce RTX 2060 mobile GPU. As a Max-P (max-performance) GPU, its power is limited to 115W as opposed to 160W for the desktop equivalent and consequently has lower clock and memory speeds.

Having purchased the NUC11PHKi7C barebones model I’ve added a 2TB M.2 2280 NVMe drive from addlink (S70) and 64GB (2 x 32GB) DDR4 3200MHz memory from G.SKILL. For the comparison, the NUC 9 Extreme I’ve used my NUC9i7QNX which has a 2TB M.2 2280 NVMe drive from ADATA (XPG 8200 Pro), 64GB (2 x 32GB) of Team Group’s Team Elite DDR4 3200MHz memory, and an EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO ULTRA GAMING GPU.

Linux Installation Issues

One of the benchmarks requires compiling its code which is written in C with the ‘-march=native’ option. However, the default 9.3.0 version of ‘gcc’ installed in Ubuntu 20.04 fails to recognize the ‘tigerlake’ architecture of this new CPU so the solution is to install and use the later 10.2.0 version of ‘gcc’ as this simple example shows:

gcc error tigerlake

Running the game Grand Theft Auto V under Proton on Steam also encountered some issues. The first problem is that after running an initial benchmark the game resets the graphics to some unknown state where the framerate subsequently fluctuates excessively and performance is degraded. For example during an initial run the framerate for the following scene is over 187:

initial gtav scene
whereas subsequent runs can result in a framerate dipping into the 30s:

subsequent gtav scene
The second problem is when connecting to an HDMI monitor via a Thunderbolt port and using PRIME to set the GPU to NVIDIA:

Intel NUC 11 Linux prime setting
the game refuses to load:

gtav error
No working solution for either issue has been found so far.

Intel NUC 11 “Enthusiast Phantom Canyon” Linux Performance

As I had already installed Windows I first shrank the Windows partition in half and created a new partition into which I installed Linux using an Ubuntu 20.04.2 ISO as dual boot. After installation and updates, a brief check showed working Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Ethernet.

The key hardware information under Ubuntu 20.04.2 is as follows:

linux disk management Linux info linux gpu info

First I set performance to ‘maximum’ and fan mode to ‘cool’ on both the NUC 9 Extreme and NUC 11 Enthusiast through the BIOS. I then booted and set the CPU Scaling Governor to ‘performance’ and ran my Linux benchmarks for which the majority of the results are text-based but the graphical ones for the NUC11PHKi7C included:

Intel NUC 11 linux geekbench 5 cpu linux heaven unigine
and also my specific set of Phoronix Test Suite tests:

Intel NUC 11 linux pts overview

All of the results for the NUC 11 Enthusiast can be compared to those from the NUC 9 Extreme:

linux mini pcs comparison

The key issue with the NUC 9 Extreme is the slow read performance for NVMe drives connected via the Compute Element compared to when connected via the baseboard and this is reflected in the results. Fortunately, this isn’t the case for the NUC 11 Extreme with performance aligned with the manufacturer’s specification. Again the impact of using a mobile RTX 2060 can be seen in graphical benchmarks such as Furmark which is 20% lower than when using the desktop version.

Gaming on Intel NUC 11 with Linux

For both NUC, I performed a quick test of three games under Steam in Ubuntu (Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Grand Theft Auto V, and Shadow Of The Tomb Raider) at 1920×1080 resolution. I used the default settings for CS:GO and GTA V together with each of the graphic presets in SOTTR:

linux sottr highest

Note that on Ubuntu I relied on Steam’s in-game FPS counter in CS:GO and GTA V’s in-game FPS counter to estimate the average FPS as I did not have tools equivalent to MSI AFterburner/Rivatuner available.

Again the impact of the mobile GPU was evident:

linux gamingHowever, the most notable difference between the two devices is actually the fan noise. The fans reach their loudest during the market scene in the SOTTR benchmark and using a hand-held sound meter I measured around 54dBA for the NUC9i7QNX when it was best described as a loud whooshing. In contrast, I measured only around 44 dBA for the NUC11PHKi7C and it sounded like a low hum which was very acceptable. The ambient sound was around 33 dBA.

Windows Revisited

As a result of my 3200MHz Team Group’s Team Elite memory in the NUC11PHKi7C failing to boot I initially had to use some 2400MHz memory from Samsung for the previous Windows performance tests. Now that I have replaced this with some 3200MHz G.SKILL memory I have rerun all the Windows benchmarks. Interestingly, this only saw minor improvements in only a few benchmarks. Specifically, the Passmark score improved by 3% due to the Memory Mark improving by 17%. Productivity in PCMark 10 improved by 7% and finally Geekbench 5 scores for single and multi-core improved by 3% and 5% respectively.

Then I changed the fan mode from ‘balanced’ to ‘cool’ using Intel NUC Software Studio and reran the benchmarks. However, the impact was negligible other than reducing the productivity gain in PCMark 10 from 7% to 5% indicating that the margin of error when running the tests is probably a factor in the initial improvement. For reference across all the benchmarks, the average improvement of upgrading from 32GB of 2400MHz memory to 64GB of 3200MHz memory was 1.6% per result which increased to 1.7% in conjunction with the ‘cool’ fan mode.

The updated Windows benchmark results are:

windows mini pcs windows pts overview

I also repeated the gaming tests on Windows:

Intel NUC 11 windows gaming

which showed a similar minor improvement from upgrading the memory of between 1 to 5 FPS depending on game and settings.

Final Observations

As a ‘gaming’ mini PC, although it uses a mobile GPU resulting in the graphics performance being lower than the equivalent desktop GPU, it does meet the brief. It is somewhat pricey but so too are graphics cards currently and the NUC11PHKi7C includes one making it a better value proposition right now. Given its physical size both the CPU and GPU performance are very good and the fact that it runs near silent makes this an outstanding mini PC.

Share this:
FacebookTwitterHacker NewsSlashdotRedditLinkedInPinterestFlipboardMeWeLineEmailShare

Support CNX Software! Donate via cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or purchase goods on Amazon or Aliexpress

ROCK Pi 4C Plus

13 Replies to “Linux and Memory Performance on an Intel NUC 11 Enthusiast Phantom Canyon NUC11PHKi7C”

  1. Thanks for the long awaited review!

    I am planning to buy this to run Linux Mint and inside it few VMs similtonusely for study? Would you recommend it? Can you run three VMs in Ubuntu and measure the fan noise?

    Lastly, I heard that the Extreme version will be released in few months, would you recommend waiting or getting the Enthusiast?


    1. I haven’t tried Linux Mint so can’t comment on whether there would be any driver issues compared to Ubuntu 20.04.2 which appears to run fine.

      The fan noise from running three VMs is unlikely to be louder than the SOTTR benchmark I provided sound measurements for as this was when the fans were running at their maxiumum.

      Whilst there*maybe* a new Extreme product in the pipeline it is really hard to guess when any such release would happen given the current market difficulties. I also can’t forsee it being particularly cheap even if it is eventually released. Opting for the Extreme would also require purchasing an elusive graphics card if wanting equivalence or at least similarity with the Entusiast. As I see it the Extreme currently has benefits (desktop GPU) and drawbacks (PCH NVMe speed limitation) whereas the Entusiast’s size has benefits (small 1.3L form factor) but also drawbacks (almost a simlar sized power brick) but overall its key benefit is its quiteness under load and arguably its price and availability although that may be subjective depending on geographical location.

    1. I’m not planning on running VMs on this device however I could fire up Windows in VirtualBox on Ubuntu and Ubuntu in WSL on Windows if there was a specific reason for doing so.

    1. In Australia use ‘’ and search for ‘NUC11PHKi7C’ then click on a price and it will take you to the store where you can see stock availability. In theory only stores ‘with stock’ or ‘TBA’ should get listed but that is not always the case.

  2. What bios settings did you use to get Ubuntu to install / boot?
    Mine shipped with windows on it and I get bios errors whenever I boot off a usb.

    1. I didn’t change have to change any BIOS settings to be able to boot from a LiveUSB. What distro are you using and what errors are you getting?

  3. Hi,
    What bios settings did you use to get Linux to install? I’m having difficulty and not being able to use Linux means it’s getting sent back unfortunately!


    1. Ok, quite embarrassing… I thought the comment didn’t post! Sorry if you’re getting bombarded with notification on reddit too!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Khadas VIM4 SBC
Khadas VIM4 SBC