Home > Android, Hardware, HiSilicon, Linux > $79 HiSilicon Poplar is the First 96Boards TV Platform Compliant Board

$79 HiSilicon Poplar is the First 96Boards TV Platform Compliant Board

At the end of last month I wrote about 96Boards TV Platform specifications, and noticed Hisilicon had one such boards, but details were sparse. Linaro has now officially unveiled HiSilicon Poplar board, the first 96Boards TV Platform board, sold for $79 + shipping on Aliexpress.

Click to Enlarge

Click to Enlarge

Poplar board specifications:

  • SoC – HiSilicon Hi3798C V200 quad-core 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 CPU up to 2.0 GHz per core with ARM Mali-T720 GPU supporting OpenGL ES 3.1/3.0/2.0/1.1/1.0, OpenVG 1.1, OpenCL 1.2/1.1 Full Profile, RenderScript, and Microsoft DirectX 11 FL9_3
  • Memory – 1 or 2 GB DDR3 (Specs are conflicting depending where you look)
  • Storage – 8GB eMMC flash + micro SD card slot
  • Video Output – HDMI 2.0a with HDCP 2.2 up to 4K @ 60Hz
  • Video Decoding – H.265/HEVC Main/Main10 and VP9 up to 4K @ 60 fps
  • Audio Output – HDMI, optical S/PDIF, 3.5mm audio jack
  • Connectivity – Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11 b/g/n/ac WiFi and Bluetooth
  • USB – 1x USB 3.0 port, 2xUSB 2.0 host ports, 1x micro USB OTG port for console
  • Expansion
    • 40-pin Low Speed (LS) connector with UART, SPI, I2S, 2x I2C, 12x GPIO
    • 1x PCIe 2.0 interface
    • 12-pin Smart Card connector (unpopulated)
    • 24-pin connector for tuner (unpopulated)
  • Debugging – 1x JTAG port, 1x UART connector
  • Misc – IR receiver, boot selection jumper, LEDs, power button
  • Security – ARM Trustzone, trusted execution environment, secure boot, secure storage, secure video path, DRM, DCAS
  • Power Supply – 12V / 2A
  • Dimensions – 160 x 120 mm (96Boards TV platform specs)
  • Temperature Range – 0°C to +70°C

Hisilicon Hi3798C V200 is quite an interesting processor with many high speed and media interfaces, and while they used most of them, they did not leverage support for SATA. Luckily, there’s still USB 3.0 and PCIe if you need faster storage.

Hi3798C V200 Block Diagram - Click to Enlarge

Hi3798C V200 Block Diagram – Click to Enlarge

The board is sold with Android 5.1.1, but it will be the main development platform of Linaro Digital Home Group which aims “to continue creating optimized, high-performance secure media solutions for ARM on both Linux- and Android-based platforms. Licensees of the RDK (Linux) will be able to create Open Embedded/Yocto RDK builds for Poplar. The Poplar board will also serve as a common development platform for Android TV (AOSP) as well as for TVOS-based STB solutions used in China.”

In the meantime, you may find some information on Tocoding Poplar page, or access directly the hardware user manual. Eventually, 96Boards Poplar page will be a good place to look.

  1. mo123
    August 30th, 2016 at 21:38 | #1

    Since this board uses the same CPU as Amlogic S905,S905X & S912 it would be interesting to know if it can achieve real 2Ghz or also suffer from the same speed limits of only 1.5Ghz.

  2. August 30th, 2016 at 22:01 | #2

    mo123 :
    Since this board uses the same CPU as Amlogic S905,S905X & S912

    whaaat ? You meant “It uses the same A53 cores”, right ? They are far from being the same CPUs, from that point, it’s hard to compare them as ARM doesn’t specify a speed to set…
    That said, HiSilicon is I suppose a tad more seasoned in fabless semi design despite their respective age, being a sub of Huawei. (my personnal opinion)
    But, well, plenty of little TV boxes and SBCs lack decent heatsinks/cooling anyways.

  3. blu
    August 30th, 2016 at 22:03 | #3

    @mo123
    It uses an entirely different SoC – HiSilicon Hi3798C V200. As per A53’s clock in general – yes, it can do 2GHz at the proper nm. Qualcomm et al have been doing it for a while.

  4. blu
    August 30th, 2016 at 22:19 | #4

    BTW, this board, if they manage to produce it to quantities at that price, can be _the_ hobbyist board of choice – it craps all over the ‘consumer’ 96 boards so far, featuring usb3, Gb eth and pcie2. Also, the SoC does sata3, but where’s the connector, 96boards?

  5. nobe
    August 30th, 2016 at 22:30 | #5

    according to the hardware manual :
    – you can extend the pcie connector for sata, ethernet or wireless
    – there is 2 GB ram
    – there is a button to boot from usb
    – the provided ethernet connector is capped to 100M

  6. theguyuk
    August 30th, 2016 at 22:57 | #6

    @mo123
    While they are not the same Soc as mentioned but same A53 cores.

    It is a fair and valid question can we any longer trust ARM licences products specs. When two venders have been accused of cheating.

    ARM products are becoming like the Olympics full of cheats stealing awards.

  7. Mark Gregotski
    August 31st, 2016 at 01:51 | #7

    @blu

    Discussions in the LHG Steering Committee resulted in not making the SATA connector mandatory in the 96Boards TV Platform specification, but leaving it as an option. The decision to include a SATA connector is made by the SoC vendor. As noted, both USB3 and PCIe 2.0 are available to provide high-speed connectivity.

  8. taki
    August 31st, 2016 at 03:02 | #8

    Where we find tuner for ts connector? (Dvbs2x dvbs2 dvbc or ?) Does hisilicone 3798c Support linux hw accelaration ?

  9. obolonjkee
    August 31st, 2016 at 04:01 | #9

    What about Android 7.0 on Rpi 3? Where is this news?

  10. August 31st, 2016 at 05:11 | #10

    With no sign of the AMD Huskyboard or the LeMaker Cello in the market yet, this may be the only low cost option to gain access to an ARM64 board with a PCIe slot.

  11. August 31st, 2016 at 09:24 | #11

    @obolonjkee
    I’ve seen it, but usually that team will only provide images using software handling of the graphics and videos. Maybe this has changed.

  12. tkaiser
    August 31st, 2016 at 11:58 | #12

    @miniNodes
    And then? What do I gain from combining an Android device with a PCIe slot? Does Android contain already the drivers for all sorts of cards I might want to insert there? How does Android deal with a SAS PCIe adapter with 8 SATA disks connected?

  13. blu
    August 31st, 2016 at 15:10 | #13

    @Mark Gregotski
    Understood.

    @miniNodes
    Another alternative (albeit more expensive) is the RolidRun 8040 board. I’ll share impressions once mine arrives.

    @tkaiser
    I know that’s what it’s been designated for, but limiting that board to an android TV box would be a shame. HiSilicon have at least some interests in server/compute with their high-end server chips, so it could be beneficial to them to promote awareness in the oss dev/hobbyist circles via a full-fledged linux 96board. They already have the hw, they just need to better support it.

  14. tkaiser
    August 31st, 2016 at 17:08 | #14

    @blu
    Fair enough, let’s wait another two years and see what happened regarding Linux support and what we can then do with this PCIe slot (2 years are roughly the time we wait for availability of stuff like Huskyboard or LeMaker’s clone now?).

    Apart from that: Having interfaces present on a board with an Android SoC (read as: for tablet/OTT box use) is one thing, the other is how they perform. If I compare any of the pretty fast boards lying here around with an ‘ultra-slow’ Clearfog Base for example (only dual-core A9!) the latter performs magnitudes faster since this SoC is not made for TV boxes but different use cases. Let’s wait and see πŸ™‚

    And in the meantime I might pre-order an ARMADA 8040 just like you πŸ˜‰

  15. Jeroen
    August 31st, 2016 at 17:33 | #15

    What about the vpu?, is it anything that could be suported in kodi?

    this board would make a sweet media center then

  16. tkaiser
    August 31st, 2016 at 17:35 | #16

    On Linaro page: “Support for PCIe interface is expected to be provided in future operating system versions.” (Emphasis by me). So we have a single lane PCIe 2.0 slot without any software support while increasing the consumption requirements by 25W (or 10W if only low-profile cards are allowed)?

    BTW: USB3.0 reminds me on the few boards I had that were equipped with such a port: LeMaker’s Guitar and Roseapple Pi. Didn’t get USB 3.0 working at least once πŸ™‚

  17. cruz
    August 31st, 2016 at 17:50 | #17

    I think ARMs extremely closed nature and clear lack of focus and interest in enabling proper Linux support is hurting this communty.

    Hobbyists and other parties have been left either boucing back and forth between ARM and its partners for years or working on hacks, making the end user experience unpleasant and limiting it to hackers and devs.

    Its become clear without ARMs support for GPUs and other hardware required for desktop and server it’s going to be a long struggle as we have seen over the last 2-3 years.

    Given this is a clear opportunity for ARM itself beyond its Android mobile business the lack of focus is mysterious at best and since it doesn’t make much sense I have more or less given up.

    In the end I think the Rasberry Pi is the best shot at getting proper Linux support. The rest of the boards are either stuck with old Linux kernels, spotty support or are hobbed by other limitations, dependent on the hard work of open source developers.

  18. Catalin
    August 31st, 2016 at 18:54 | #18

    I have seen multiple boards from HiSillicon with SDK, and I can say all of them had USB3 working. One of them had PCIe, however I did not have the connector to test with a real device, but the kernel driver was there.

    Probably in the beginning might not exist support for kodi (not sure), libcec and so on… however, I expect the kodi part to be resolved pretty quickly…

    But for linux the USB3 and PCIe might be a nice addition …

  19. tkaiser
    August 31st, 2016 at 19:36 | #19

    @Catalin
    Thanks for the update. Since you seem to know HiSilicon and I stumbled accross their Kirin 620 days ago searching for ARMv8 SoCs supporting ARM’s crypto extensions… do you know whether Hi3798C V200 also supports the crypto extensions?

  20. blu
    August 31st, 2016 at 21:47 | #20

    @tkaiser
    Re that crypto extension, MT8163 supports the full set (aes sha1 sha2 crc32), and so does RK3368. Amlogic’s offerings support just crc32, and so does Snapdragon 410. Actions Semi S900 is an unknown.

  21. August 31st, 2016 at 22:50 | #21

    @tkaiser – Correct, PCIe for Android doesn’t make a whole lot of sense…Was looking more at the proposed Linux support. πŸ˜‰

    BTW, the Kirin 620 is the SoC used on the 96Boards HiKey as well, so, if you have any of those laying around you could test on that.

  22. theguyuk
    August 31st, 2016 at 22:53 | #22

    A odd solution for some of the hardware drivers in Android, is if a strong case is made for PCI equipped, USB 3 equipped, Android TV boxes.

    Why you might ask. PCI for expansion like in Intel PC. A faster Harddrive controller, faster Graphics card, Tuner sat, aerial, cable. Higher speed storage on USB, DVD, Blueray.

    The next level of Android TV box will be casual games player as well as TV.

    Now cloud connected games or networked, need a faster internet port.. 4k TV, HD games use more memory and storage.

    All just guesses by me but that is what I see beyond smart TV. Just needs Google to want to beat Amazon, Apple and Chinese TV.

    Nvidia has gone in to high price IMHO.

  23. Jeroen
    September 1st, 2016 at 03:14 | #23

    Pcie could be nice to add a raid card and turn it into a nas

  24. September 1st, 2016 at 05:00 | #24

    WTF?

    “Licensees of the RDK (Linux) will be able to create Open Embedded/Yocto RDK builds for Poplar.”

    Well done linaro for opening up the ARM linux ecosystem! Three cheers for linaro!

  25. Catalin
    September 1st, 2016 at 08:04 | #25

    @tkaiser, I did not see the SDK or the docs for V200 yet, I was talking just about previous boards I had access to.

  26. RK
    September 3rd, 2016 at 19:59 | #26

    Luc Verhaegen :
    WTF?
    β€œLicensees of the RDK (Linux) will be able to create Open Embedded/Yocto RDK builds for Poplar.”
    Well done linaro for opening up the ARM linux ecosystem! Three cheers for linaro!

    Yeah this should have been a no-brainer even if the GPU was closed since you could just use the pci-e… But ARM screwed us up again πŸ™

    It’s really sad too. A lot of the linux people, including myself, changed their minds over the last 2-3 years and have been more open to small blobs that just kickstart or update the firmware to the point everyone lined up to AMD’s “our blobs are part of the hardware design”. And despite this, ARM is just giving us the finger and refusing to push for proper licenses and open-source mainlining.

    Sad times πŸ™

  27. looun
    September 5th, 2016 at 21:29 | #27

    interesting board πŸ™‚

  28. Mark Gregotski
    September 5th, 2016 at 23:50 | #28

    @Luc Verhaegen
    Linaro cannot control if RDK LLC requires end-users to sign a license.
    In the meantime, LHG will work to port our OE Linux-based Reference Platform Builds from HiKey to Poplar that use open source components and are available for everyone to use (for example: http://www.linaro.org/blog/engineering-update-16-04/).

  29. September 6th, 2016 at 16:25 | #29

    Mark,

    Because of their position towards binary drivers, linaro has a pretty bad standing as it is. Linaros unwillingness or inability to take a stance against them undermines everything that linaro tries to publicly stand for. And now linaro is working together with partners which pull tricks like this. This might be an internal oversight, and should require better partner coordination in future, but it only underlines the massive moral debt that the linaro consortium has built up.

    This is the headline: “Linaro Announces First Development Board Compliant with 96Boards TV Platform Specification”, and then it turns out that the board provider gives only restricted access to the source code, the delivery is full of binary blobs, and only android is supposedly supported.

    If that is what linaro is bringing to the world, then why do we have linaro again?

  30. September 6th, 2016 at 16:41 | #30

    I thought that linaro was about solving the technical issues around software, namely the linux support on ARM based systems. Instead we see an industry consortium, which condones bad software practices (and even markets them, apparently, if the background of this press release is looked at), which will be remembered for a set of board formats that only a few obscure manufacturers cared about…. Oh, and for which the ratio of announcements and the actual availability of the hardware is just as poor as everywhere else.

    I know, this is of course an exaggeration of the actual situation, but it is not totally unfair, now is it?

  31. bob nospam
    November 1st, 2016 at 23:12 | #31

    So, a couple months have gone by, and the hardware is available, but still no sign of the chip docs/firmware source/etc.

    So, basically this board has potential, but like most of the other linaro/96boards releases should be treated as proof of concept hardware that may not work, and is likely to be abandoned before it actually works. AKA the firmware/kernel drivers will never be up-streamed. Which means the chances of it ever running a real debian/fedora/android that hasn’t been hacked up by linaro are close to 0.

  32. November 2nd, 2016 at 14:18 | #32

    @bob nospam
    I can only find the Android 5.1 firmware image, and some hardware documentation and SoC datasheet @ http://en.tocoding.com/index.php/96boards-poplar/

    But no source code at all. That’s depressing, and not good for 96Boards reputation.

  1. No trackbacks yet.