Intel Core m3 Skylake Compute Stick Benchmarked, Tested with Ubuntu 16.04 and Chromium OS

Intel unveiled five new Compute Sticks for 2016, with two Cherry Trail models, and three Skylake Core M models namely STK2M3W64CC and STK2MV64CC based on Intel Core m3-6Y30 processor, as well as STK2MV64CC with a more powerful Core m5-6Y57 vPRO processor. Ian Morrison (Linuxium) managed to get an early sample of STK2M3W64CC running Windows 10 on 4GB RAM and 64GB storage, and posted some benchmarks, as well as results of his experimentations with Ubuntu and Chrome OS in the Intel section of G+ MINI PCs community and his own website.


He started by running some standard benchmarks in Windows 10 including CrystalDiskMark (storage performance), Passmark8, and 3DMark, and while the storage performance is underwhelming, the processor is clearly and noticeably faster than Braswell, and Cherry Trail processors in terms of CPU and GPU performance based on comparisons with  Tronsmart Ara X5 (x5-Z8300), Kangaroo Mobile Desktop (x5-Z8500), Voyo V3 (x7-Z8700), and Intel Braswell based  Intel NUC5CPYB/H NUC, and MINIX NGC-1.

Benchmarks vs Bay Trail and Cherry Trail Platforms
Benchmarks vs Bay Trail and Cherry Trail Platforms

The results of 3DMark Ice Storm 1.2 benchmark were divided by 20 for a more readable chart.

Ubuntu 16.04 on - Click to Enlarge
Ubuntu 16.04 on STK2M3W64CC Compute Stick  – Click to Enlarge

He also booted Ubuntu 16.04 daily build from micro SD card and an ISO image from Windows 10, and everything worked, including WiFi and HDMI audio, contrary to lower cost platforms. Chromium OS could also be booted from an ISO located in the eMMC in the Windows 10 partition.

Ian also gave an historical perspective of the progress made since the first HDMI TV stick (MK802) launched four years ago, by comparing the Phoronix benchmarks in Ubuntu 12.04 for MK802+ (Allwinner A10 Cortex A8 processor) and Ubuntu 16.04 for the latest Intel Compute Stick.

MK802_vs_Intel_Compute_StickMost results show at least 10 times more performance, and some up to 60 times faster (OpenSSL may use some hardware acceleration in the Intel platform), but  nobody should be surprised that a $399 device in 2016 performs way better than a $70 in 2012.

You can see how Ubuntu 16.04 performs in STK2M3W64CC – especially app loading times – in the video below.

STK2M364CC,  the version with Windows 10, should sell for $399,  and STK2m364CC, the one without OS, is shown for $366.85 on a US site. Neither are listed on Amazon US or Newegg yet, but you might be able to find a local reseller.

Share this:

Support CNX Software! Donate via cryptocurrencies, become a Patron on Patreon, or purchase goods on Amazon or Aliexpress

ROCK 5 ITX RK3588 mini-ITX motherboard
Notify of
The comment form collects your name, email and content to allow us keep track of the comments placed on the website. Please read and accept our website Terms and Privacy Policy to post a comment.
8 years ago

From the original Intel announcement
“MSRP for Intel Compute Stick with Intel Core m3 processor is $399 with Windows 10”
“MSRP for Intel Compute Stick with Intel Core m5 processor is $499 with no operating system”

Wow … 399+ USD for a stick? To me, a stick is a low-cost device. I would never pay more than 100 USD for it. Above 100 USD I expect something firm, for example like an Apple TV box, with a VESA-mount.

8 years ago

Finally we can make a conclusion, low cost Intel chip especially Atom-based could not run graphical distribution linux out of the box. We need to pay more up to Labtop/Desktop price tag.

Then ARM still continue occupied almost embedded market segment.

8 years ago

Wow, the price is just horrible. who would want to buy that..? Should be sub $200 at least

Khadas VIM4 SBC